Dear authors,
In PBB-EVPN we advertise PE shared BMACs or dedicated (per-ES) BMACs. Either
way, I believe it is a good practice to advertise them as ’static’ i.e. along
with the ’sticky’ bit. That provides a natural protection against BMACs that
might be learnt locally and are not ‘managed’.
I
Thank you Tony.
Very helpful feedback.
Jorge
-Original Message-
From: Antoni Przygienda
Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 at 4:53 PM
To: Jorge Rabadan , Erik Nordmark
, "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)"
Cc: "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: RE: [bess] ARP ND draft
>> [JORGE] 2 ACs on the same ESI/EVI on the
> [JORGE] 2 ACs on the same ESI/EVI on the same PE? I suppose to are talking
> about VLAN-aware bundle interfaces, where each VLAN goes to a different BD?
> note that the proxy-arp/nd function is per broadcast domain, i.e. one per EVI
> for
> VLAN-based and VLAN-bundle and one per BD for VLAN-awar
The challenge for IPv4 is that I don’t see an easy way to learn dynamically
from access attachment circuits that a given ipv4 is anycast. Even for default
gateways, if they are integrated in the EVPN PE, we are good, but if they are
external and connected to a MAC-VRF, it is not so clear how to
Hi Robert and Tony,
As Wim mentioned, ipv6 anycast is something that we will add to the draft in
the next rev. There is an easy way to know if a given proxy-ND entry belongs to
an anycast address or not and disable the duplicate IP detection for those.
The challenge for IPv4 is that I don’t see
Hey Tony,
Thank you for your comments.
Please see in-line.
-Original Message-
From: Antoni Przygienda
Date: Monday, March 30, 2015 at 12:26 AM
To: Jorge Rabadan , Erik Nordmark
, "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)"
Cc: "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] ARP ND draft
>Hey Jorge, I read your draft
Hi Stewart,
Thanks a lot for the prompt review☺
It seems the idnits tool used upon upload is not compatiable with the newest
version (indeed, no issue was ever found in draft submission).
We have corrected those nits.
Regarding Line 614-617, we suggested to use:
1) If either the root VLAN ID
Yuanlong,
Lots of thanks for an extra-prompt response.
I agree that an E-Tree service may have no leaves in its transient states.
So I am OK with not adding new restrictions.
Regards,
Sasha
Office: +972-39266302
Cell: +972-549266302
Email: alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com
From: Jiangyuanl
