I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Regards,
Muhammad Durrani
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER.ENGINEERING
mdurr...@cisco.com
Phone: +1 408 527 6921
Cisco Systems Limited
US
Cisco.com
Think before you print.
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
Besides the below IPR, I am not aware of any other IP related to the draft.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2697/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2696/
Regards
Pradeep
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jayant
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 4:36 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Sub
Besides the below IPR, I am not aware of any other IP related to the draft.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2697/https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2696/
From: kanwar.si...@alcatel-lucent.com
To: bess@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:59:20 +
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-fail
Dear Thomas Morin, Robert Kebler:
An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled "Multicast
VPN fast upstream failover" (draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover) was
submitted to the IETF Secretariat on and has been posted on the "IETF Page of
Intellectual Property Rights Disclosure
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc-03 [1] as a working group item.
Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or
not (in the later case, please also state the reasons).
This poll runs until **November
Hi Ali,
I have read through the draft, i think the procedures is fine for IGMP/MLD
proxy. However, this draft doesn't consider multicast router scenario, better
to be added.
Scenario 1:
An EVPN PE acts as multicast router and runs PIM protocol with the
outside multicast routers.
Sce
