Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-02

Support as co-author. A solution without percolating multicast forwarding state on every device in the core or edge is very desirable. Not aware of any IPR. - Ravi Shekhar. On Jan 31, 2016 8:48 AM, Aldrin Isaac wrote: Support as co-author. IETF should adopt this

Re: [bess] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree

Hi Jeffrey, Thanks for the review. Your comments helps tighten the draft some more. I have updated the draft and will publish it next (rev04). Majority of the comments were editorial in nature for better clarifications. Since the existing draft (rev03) reflects the consensus regarding our several

[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-04.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : E-TREE Support in EVPN & PBB-EVPN Authors : Ali Sajassi Samer

Re: [bess] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree

Thanks. This has already been noted and IANA section has been updated accordingly. Cheers, Ali On 1/26/16, 11:04 AM, "BESS on behalf of Poorna Pushkala B" wrote: >Hi > >In section 5.1 of version 3 of the draft, the subtype is mentioned

Re: [bess] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree

Support publication of this draft. It is a good document for the Etree framework to EVPN. Thanks, ―Satya On 1/24/16, 9:40 PM, "BESS on behalf of Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" wrote: > >Support publication of this document as a co-author and I am

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-02

Support as co-author. IETF should adopt this use-case -- optimized multi-destination forwarding for overlays where multicast support is not available in the underlay. I am not aware of any related IPR. On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:12 AM Thomas Morin wrote: > Hello working