Hi Martin,
I'm not aware of any related and undisclosed IPR.
(and yes, as a co-author, I certainly support adoption!)
-Thomas
Martin Vigoureux :
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-fm-bess-service-chaining-02 [1] as a working group Document.
Please state
As co-author, I support adoption of this draft. I am not aware of any IPR
relating to this draft apart from that filed by Ericsson and reported to the
IETF at the following URL:
-
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?draft=draft-fm-bess-service-chaining&submit=draft&rfc=&doctitle=&group=&ho
The only IPR of which I am personally aware of is the 2284 disclosure
mentioned below.
On 2/22/16, 8:58 AM, "Martin Vigoureux" wrote:
>Hello working group,
>
>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>draft-fm-bess-service-chaining-02 [1] as a working group Document.
>
>Please state on th
I am not aware of any IPR
Maria
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 23, 2016, at 8:06 AM, Bruno Rijsman wrote:
>
> The only IPR of which I am personally aware of is the 2284 disclosure
> mentioned below.
>
>
>
>> On 2/22/16, 8:58 AM, "Martin Vigoureux" wrote:
>>
>> Hello working group,
>>
>> Th
Support.
We need a standards and interoperable way of chaining L2 and L3 services in the
network.
- Ravi.
-Original Message-
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 8:59 AM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-fm-bess-service-chain..
Hi!
I think that the title of this document clearly reflects what you want to do —
which may be one of the reasons there was virtually no discussion about it (or
any of its predecessors) on the list. However, I think the contents leave many
open doors that need to be closed before this documen
