Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

Support as co-author. I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Regards , Sajjad. -Original Message- From: Shah, Himanshu [mailto:hs...@ciena.com] Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 7:49 AM To: Luay Jalil; Thomas Morin Cc: BESS; draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org Subject: RE:

Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03

+1 Jim Uttaro -Original Message- From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US) Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 1:16 PM To: Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR) ; BESS Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang

Hi Thomas, As a co-author, I support this draft. Thanks Tapraj On 5/5/16, 7:52 AM, "BESS on behalf of Shah, Himanshu" wrote: >I support this draft for WG adoption and am not aware >Of any IPR that applies to this draft. > >Himanshu using

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang

I support this draft for WG adoption and am not aware Of any IPR that applies to this draft. Himanshu using iPad (so excuse the auto-corrects...) From: BESS [bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Patrice Brissette (pbrisset) [pbris...@cisco.com] Sent:

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

Hi, As a co-author, I support this draft. I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this document. Best Regards, Shunwan -邮件原件- 发件人: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Thomas Morin 发送时间: 2016年5月4日 22:18 收件人: bess@ietf.org 抄送: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org 主题: [bess] Poll

Re: [bess] [Idr] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay vs. draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps

I agree with John. Thanks. Jorge On 5/5/16, 2:57 PM, "EXT John E Drake" > wrote: Thomas, The overlay draft preceded the tunnel encaps draft and it was designed to handle a very specific problem, marrying the EVPN control plane to the VXLAN data

Re: [bess] [Idr] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay vs. draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps

Thomas, The overlay draft preceded the tunnel encaps draft and it was designed to handle a very specific problem, marrying the EVPN control plane to the VXLAN data plane draft and modulo the correction to section 9 it is internally consistent. The tunnel encaps draft solves a more general

Re: [bess] [Idr] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay vs. draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps

Thanks for the clarification on the intent around draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay. Then indeed section 9 needs some tidying up. The issue that I think remain is that it would be much cleaner to explain how to use PMSI with overlay encaps in a spec not specific to E-VPN and in a way more

[bess] WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03

Hello Working Group, Please read carefully, this e-mail contains new elements compared to other WG LCs. This email starts a Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03 [1]. ¤ Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent version yet, and send your comments to the

Re: [bess] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-pta-flags-03: (with COMMENT)

Eric, For my own understanding and apologies if this is a dumb question, but I read this in RFC5226: "Standards Action - Values are assigned only for Standards Track RFCs approved by the IESG.” What do you mean by "at least Standards Action comes with early allocation”? This still requires