[bess] Fwd: [IANA #907843] General Request for Assignment (bgp-extended-communities - draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining)

2016-05-12 Thread Thomas Morin
Hi everyone, FYI: codepoints just assigned by IANA in the corresponding FCFS registry for the two Extended Communities defined in draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining. The draft itself remains to be updated. Best, -Thomas --- Begin Message --- Dear Thomas, IANA has registered the following Tra

Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03

2016-05-12 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)
Jeffrey, I’m sure we will fix the editorial changes… Just wanted to comment on a few questions you had on the VIDs, eth-tags, P/B bits and ES label. Please see in-line with [JORGE]. Thank you! Jorge On 5/11/16, 8:13 PM, "BESS on behalf of EXT Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" wrote: >Hi, > >As the d

Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03

2016-05-12 Thread Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
Hi Jorge, > -Original Message- > From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US) [mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 7:44 AM > To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang ; BESS > Subject: Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) > for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03 >

Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03

2016-05-12 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)
Hi Jeffrey, More in-line. Thanks. On 5/12/16, 3:43 PM, "EXT Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" wrote: >Hi Jorge, > >> -Original Message- >> From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US) [mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com] >> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 7:44 AM >> To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang ; BESS >> Subject:

Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03

2016-05-12 Thread Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
Hi Jorge, > >If a PE sends a route w/o setting P-bit, wouldn't that indicate it is a > backup? Why would it bother sending the route if it does not want to be > the backup? > > [JORGE] Let’s assume you have 3 PEs in ES-1 (PE1/2/3) that is a single- > active ES. PE4 is a remote PE doing backup fun

Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03

2016-05-12 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)
HI Jeffrey, On 5/12/16, 8:13 PM, "BESS on behalf of EXT Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" wrote: >Hi Jorge, > >> >If a PE sends a route w/o setting P-bit, wouldn't that indicate it is a >> backup? Why would it bother sending the route if it does not want to be >> the backup? >> >> [JORGE] Let’s assume

Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03

2016-05-12 Thread Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Hi Jeffrey, This is a draft based on RF7432 and as such we are expecting tag manipulation wrt vlan-based service to be consistent with RFC 7432. Additional comments below Š On 5/12/16, 11:27 AM, "BESS on behalf of Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)" wrote: >HI Jeffrey, > > >On 5/12/16, 8:13 PM, "BESS

Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03

2016-05-12 Thread Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
Hi Jorge, Ali, > [JORGE2] In VPWS DF election is needed for single-active. The NDF will > block the AC for the service. > [JORGE] This is single active, so only one can transmit/receive to/from > the CE. So only that one should send P=1. If I understand it correctly, the draft should specify the

Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03

2016-05-12 Thread Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Hi Jeffrey, On 5/12/16, 12:12 PM, "BESS on behalf of Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" wrote: >Hi Jorge, Ali, > >> [JORGE2] In VPWS DF election is needed for single-active. The NDF will >> block the AC for the service. > >> [JORGE] This is single active, so only one can transmit/receive to/from >> the C