I would also like to indicate my support.
Cheers,Aldrin
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 6:58 AM -0800, "Thomas Morin"
wrote:
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-01 [1] as a working group item.
Please send comments
Support, not aware of IPR related to this draft
On 07/02/2017, 07:42, "BESS on behalf of Dolganow, Andrew (Nokia - SG)"
wrote:
Support
Andrew
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 6, 2017, at 10:07 PM, Martin Vigoureux
wrote:
>
> Hello Working Group,
>
Hi Himanshu,
Please see comments inline.
From: "Shah, Himanshu" mailto:hs...@ciena.com>>
Date: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 12:45 PM
To: Sami Boutros mailto:sbout...@vmware.com>>, Sami
Boutros mailto:boutros.s...@gmail.com>>, Iftekhar
Hussain mailto:ihuss...@infinera.com>>
Cc: Jeffrey Zhang mai
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS of the IETF.
Title : VPWS support in EVPN
Authors : Sami Boutros
Ali Sajassi
Hi Sami –
It seems to me that single-active multihoming case could use some more
clarification text.
I think there should be an additional field in L2 extended community
as (for example) “election priority” so that each multi-homed member can
definitely tell
to each other as well as to remote P
Support as a co-author. I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft.
Thanks,
Derek
On 1/31/17, 9:58 AM, "Thomas Morin" wrote:
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-01 [1] as a worki
Hi Iftekhar,
The management entity you are looking for is the evpn VPWS service instance,
fxc can map more than one AC to this. I will add a definition in the doc to
this evpn VPWS instance and mention that only one AC can be xconnected to it.
Will that be ok?
[Iftekhar2] An issue pointed ear
Hi Sami,
Please see in-line {iftekhar2]
From: Sami Boutros [mailto:sbout...@vmware.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2017 11:59 AM
To: Iftekhar Hussain
Cc: Alvaro Retana (aretana); Jeffrey Zhang; bess-cha...@ietf.org;
bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] AD Review
Support
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:56 PM -0300, "Oya Luengo, Roberto (Nokia - US)"
wrote:
Support
On 2/6/17, 5:07 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
wrote:
>Hello Working Group,
>
>This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
>draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay-04
Hi Iftekhar,
Are you ok with what I added to the doc? For presenting the entity for
Management.
VPWS Service Instance: It is represented by a pair of EVPN service labels
associated with a pair of endpoints. Each label is downstream assigned and
advertised by the disposition PE through an Ether
Support.
Thanks,
Wen
On 2/7/17, 1:56 PM, "BESS on behalf of Oya Luengo, Roberto (Nokia - US)"
wrote:
Support
On 2/6/17, 5:07 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
wrote:
>Hello Working Group,
>
>This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
>draft-iet
Support as a co-author.
Thanks,
Wen
On 1/31/17, 9:58 AM, "Thomas Morin" wrote:
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-01 [1] as a working group item.
Please send comments to the list and state if you s
Support
On 2/6/17, 5:07 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
wrote:
>Hello Working Group,
>
>This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
>draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay-04 [1] which is considered mature and
>ready for a final working group review.
>
>Please read the document if you have
Support as co-author.
I am not aware of any IPR that has not been disclosed yet.
Thanks,
Senthil.
-Original Message-
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia -
US)
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 11:45 PM
To: Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR); bess@ietf.o
Support
Thanks,
Sami
> On Feb 6, 2017, at 5:14 AM, Martin Vigoureux
> wrote:
>
> WG,
>
> major omission in my previous e-mail:
> ¤ We are also polling for knowledge of implementations of part or all of what
> this document specifies. This information is expected as per [3]. Please
> infor
support
thanks
nabeel
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Martin Vigoureux wrote:
> Hello Working Group,
>
> This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
> draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay-04 [1] which is considered mature and
> ready for a final working group review.
>
> Please read the documen
I support
Regards,
Patrice Brissette
On 2017-02-06, 8:14 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
wrote:
WG,
major omission in my previous e-mail:
¤ We are also polling for knowledge of implementations of part or all of
what this document specifies. This information is ex
Support
Andrew
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 6, 2017, at 10:07 PM, Martin Vigoureux
> wrote:
>
> Hello Working Group,
>
> This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
> draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay-04 [1] which is considered mature and ready
> for a final working group review.
>
> Pl
Support.
Thx,
Brian
-Original Message-
From: BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux
Date: Monday, 6 February 2017 at 9:14 PM
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay-04
WG,
major omission in my previous e-mail:
¤ We are al
Yes/support
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 00:06 Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
wrote:
>
> Support as a co-author. Cisco has implemented this draft and it has
> deployments based on some sections of this draft. I am not aware of any
> IPR that hasn’t already been disclosed.
>
> Cheers,
> Ali
>
> On 2/6/17, 5:14 A
Support as a co-author. Cisco has implemented this draft and it has
deployments based on some sections of this draft. I am not aware of any
IPR that hasn’t already been disclosed.
Cheers,
Ali
On 2/6/17, 5:14 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
wrote:
>WG,
>
>major omission in my previous
21 matches
Mail list logo