Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

In red.. Thanks, Himanshu From: BESS on behalf of Sami Boutros Date: Friday, February 24, 2017 at 2:29 PM To: "Shah, Himanshu" , Alvaro Retana , "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org"

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Hi Himanshu, Please see comments inline. Hi Sami – Some more comments for your consideration (based on -09- version) – Many of the followings are either clarifications related or editorial. 1- Overall comment : the draft uses long sentences, short sentences are more favored (at least that

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Hi Sami – Some more comments for your consideration (based on -09- version) – Many of the followings are either clarifications related or editorial. 1- Overall comment : the draft uses long sentences, short sentences are more favored (at least that is the feedback I used to get for my drafts).

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

One more thing…you’re missing the reference to RFC5226. Thanks! Alvaro. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay-04

All, there is good support for this document, but we are missing few answers to the IPR question. As soon as they come in we'll move towards publication. Thanks -m Le 06/02/2017 à 14:07, Martin Vigoureux a écrit : Hello Working Group, This email starts a Working Group Last Call on