Re: [bess] Slots requests for BESS WG session - IETF 98 - Chicago

2017-03-13 Thread Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Hi Martin, I¹d like to request the following two slots: Slot-1: https:///www.ietf.org/id/draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-fast-df-recovery-00.txt Ali Sajassi 10 min Slot-2: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-keyupate-bess-evpn-virtual-hub-00.txt Ali Sajassi or Jeffrey Zhang 15 min Cheers, Ali On 3/6/17,

[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-yang-02.txt

2017-03-13 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS of the IETF. Title : Yang Data Model for EVPN Authors : Patrice Brissette Ali Sajassi

[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-l2vpn-yang-05.txt

2017-03-13 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS of the IETF. Title : YANG Data Model for MPLS-based L2VPN Authors : Himanshu Shah Patrice Brissette

[bess] Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-11

2017-03-13 Thread Matthew Miller
Reviewer: Matthew Miller Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG

[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-l2vpn-yang-04.txt

2017-03-13 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS of the IETF. Title : YANG Data Model for MPLS-based L2VPN Authors : Himanshu Shah Patrice Brissette

Re: [bess] Routing Directorate Review for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-10

2017-03-13 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)
Hi Sami, About this: “I think having a PE send P=B=0 to be ignored by the receiving PE is not a good logic to start with, One can argue why send something that will be ignored anyway?” [JORGE] yes, ignore is not the best term. I’m not sure I get what you mean by wrongly withdraw the route? we

Re: [bess] Routing Directorate Review for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-10

2017-03-13 Thread Shah, Himanshu
I agree with Sami. Thanks, Himanshu From: BESS on behalf of Sami Boutros Date: Monday, March 13, 2017 at 12:38 PM To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)" , "Acee Lindem (acee)" , "bess@ietf.org" , "rtg-...@tools.ietf.org" , "rtg-...@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org" Subject: Re:

Re: [bess] Routing Directorate Review for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-10

2017-03-13 Thread Sami Boutros
Hi Jorge, Isn’t the end result is to clear any previous state that the receiving PE learned from the PE that’s advertising now P=B=0? I think having a PE send P=B=0 to be ignored by the receiving PE is not a good logic to start with, One can argue why send something that will be ignored anyway

[bess] YANG module issue in draft-ietf-bess-l2vpn-yang-03

2017-03-13 Thread Benoit Claise
Dear authors, You made a mistake with the CODE BEGINS/CODE ENDS with this new draft version. https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-l2vpn-yang-03.txt This should be: file "ietf-l2...@2016-10-24.yang" and not (CODE BEGINS) file "ietf-l2...@2017-03-06.yang Ditto for CODE ENDS. As

[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-02.txt

2017-03-13 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS of the IETF. Title : Multicast VPN fast upstream failover Authors : Thomas Morin Robert Kebler

Re: [bess] Routing Directorate Review for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-10

2017-03-13 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)
Hi Acee and Sami, Thank you both for explaining, I think I now understand your point. I thought the sentence had more to do with error handling at application level, hence my point that P=B=0 was a legitimate combination. I think the three of us agree that receiving an update with P=B=0 is an

Re: [bess] Routing Directorate Review for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-10

2017-03-13 Thread Sami Boutros
Hi Jorge, The issue I see with ignoring the routes with P and B Flags clear is the following: What if a PE advertised P or B Flag set then decide to send P and B Flags clear, what should we do in that case? Ignore the P and B Flags clear route and keep the old P or B Flag set route, wouldn’t

Re: [bess] Routing Directorate Review for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-10

2017-03-13 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Jorge, On 3/13/17, 9:04 AM, "BESS on behalf of Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)" wrote: >Sami, > >About this one: > >³ 1. Why is receiving an extended community with both the P and B flags >set treated as a withdrawal, while it is ignored for the case when both >the P and B flags are clear? > >

[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-04.txt

2017-03-13 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS of the IETF. Title : Usage and applicability of BGP MPLS based Ethernet VPN Authors : Jorge Rabadan Sen

[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-l2vpn-yang-03.txt

2017-03-13 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS of the IETF. Title : YANG Data Model for MPLS-based L2VPN Authors : Himanshu Shah Patrice Brissette

Re: [bess] Routing Directorate Review for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-10

2017-03-13 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)
Sami, About this one: “ 1. Why is receiving an extended community with both the P and B flags set treated as a withdrawal, while it is ignored for the case when both the P and B flags are clear? I agree both should be treated as a withdrawal, I will change the text.” [JORGE] Sami, please cor