[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming-02.txt

2018-09-14 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF. Title : BGP based Multi-homing in Virtual Private LAN Service Authors : Bhupesh Kothari

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-11: (with COMMENT)

2018-09-14 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:29:49AM +0200, Robert Raszuk wrote: > Hi Benjamin, > > > A general comment that we've been making on lots of documents in this > > space is that it would be nice to be in a place where the acronym "VPN" > > implies transport encryption. > > Let me observe that for a lot

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-11: (with COMMENT)

2018-09-14 Thread Glenn Mansfield Keeni
Dear Tsuno, I agree with Benjamin Kaduk's comment on the Security Considerations section. I understand the following sentence copied verbatim from The Security Guidelines for IETF MIB modules >> Some of the readable objects in this MIB module (i.e., objects >> with a MAX-ACCESS othe

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-11: (with COMMENT)

2018-09-14 Thread Hiroshi Tsunoda
Dear Glenn, Thank for your advice on the the Security Considerations section. I am going to revise that section along with your advice. -- tsuno 2018-09-15 11:07 GMT+09:00 Glenn Mansfield Keeni : > Dear Tsuno, > I agree with Benjamin Kaduk's comment on the Security > Considerations section.

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-11: (with COMMENT)

2018-09-14 Thread Hiroshi Tsunoda
Hi Benjamin, Thank you very much for your thorough review and comments. My replies are inline. > Perhaps I'm confused, but "mvpnAdvtPeerAddr" appears in the security > considerations in the list of address-related objects that may have > privacy/security impact. That list is predicated on being