Hi all,
I am now reading the draft, and I see that it is a substantial improvement over
the earlier versions.
At the same time I have a question regarding the definition of Type 3
(Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag) EVPN route in this (and previous) versions.
The YANG definition of this route r
Hi Jeffery,
wondering if you got chance to updated text & if you are fine with it.
Mankamana
> On Feb 13, 2019, at 7:09 PM, zhang.zh...@zte.com.cn wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> Thank you very much for your clarification!
> I made a mistake that I thought the BFD session is the base solution for UM
Support the draft.
Thanks,
--Satya
From: BESS on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com"
Date: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 12:43 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" ,
"draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobil...@ietf.org"
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for
draft
