[bess] Review of draft-ietf-bess-l2vpn-yang-10

Hi authors, I reviewed the draft and I have a question on the endpoint with the choice of "ac" case. When we configure the "ac" case of the "endpoint" node according to this draft, is it still necessary or not for us to configure the "bind-network-instance-name" leaf of the

[bess] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-04

Matthew Bocci has requested publication of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-04 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the BESS working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags/ ___ BESS

[bess] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd-08

Matthew Bocci has requested publication of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd-08 as Informational on behalf of the BESS working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd/ ___ BESS