Hi Adrian,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 11:11:10PM +0100, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Ben,
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> > DISCUSS:
> >
> > I think we may still need some text changes to clarify how the joint list
> > of SFIR-RD and SFIR Pool Identifier Extended Communities is constructed
> > and interpr
Ben,
Thanks for the update.
> DISCUSS:
>
> I think we may still need some text changes to clarify how the joint list
> of SFIR-RD and SFIR Pool Identifier Extended Communities is constructed
> and interpreted, and potentially need to register an RD Type matching
> the other (TBD6+TBD7) values we
Just coming back to you on this one, Alvaro
> I'm not too keen on the use of treat-as-withdraw, specially because
> the sender doesn't know that something happened. Knowing that the
> communication is direct between the controller/classifier, I would
> like to propose thinking of multiple com
Thanks Murray.
-16 fixes "L3VPN", "NRLI", and "EVPN"
I've also been back to check through Adam's Comment and fixed a few other
bits and pieces.
Best,
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: BESS On Behalf Of Murray Kucherawy via
Datatracker
Sent: 22 June 2020 00:56
To: The IESG
Cc: slitkows.i
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.
Title : BGP Control Plane for the Network Service Header in
Service Function Chaining
Authors : Adrian Farrel
