Support
Thanks
Gyan
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 6:20 PM Jakob Heitz (jheitz) wrote:
> Makes sense. Support.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jakob.
>
>
>
> *From:* Idr *On Behalf Of * Susan Hares
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 11, 2021 4:12 AM
> *To:* i...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [Idr] IDR WG last ca
Hi Wei,
This draft presents a peculiar way of bringing something similar to
bridge-domain/bridge-table concepts into IP-VRFs..
One significant problem, in my opinion, is that you not only introduce a new
dataplane dependency; but also propose to _redefine_ VXLAN-GPE header semantics
(instead o
Hi Wei,
On my side, I don’t understand the problem statement.
Would it be possible to clarify that aspect? The draft seems to provide a
solution but there is no explicit text about the what you are trying to solve.
Regards,
Patrice Brissette, Principal Engineer
Cisco Systems
http://e-vpn.io
http
Luc, Stephane,
Rev 07 has just been published with the discussed changes.
Thank you very much.
Jorge
From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 8:32 AM
To: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) , 'Luc
Andre Burdet (lburdet)' , 'Luc André Burdet'
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.
Title : Preference-based EVPN DF Election
Authors : J. Rabadan
S. Sathappan
Hi Wei,
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
The ESI type was conceived in RFC7432 to specify the format of the remaining 9
bytes and produce unique ESIs, in the case auto-derived ESIs and manual ESIs
had to coexist in the same network.
Irrespective, on reception of the EVPN routes with non-zer
Hi Linda and Jorge,
Thanks for your comments at IETF110 meeting, and I think I need
to explain our considerations for the newly defined LSI (Logical Session
Identifier) concept.
Question 1, from Linda Dunbar, "Is the usage of LSI same as the RD for VPN
route distinguish?"
Answer: LSI(Logic
Sandy, if you want to see it that way, yepp, you can think of one of the things
AUTO EVPN does as “BGP peer auto-configuration”. This is however just a small
part of the overall and really just kind of “necessary byproduct”, especially
since the sessions to RR can go multi-hop so even with bgp s
