Hi Jorge,
Please see in-line with [yubao].
Thanks
Yubao
原始邮件
发件人：Rabadan,Jorge(Nokia-US/MountainView)
收件人：王玉保10045807;
抄送人：bess@ietf.org;
日 期 ：2021年11月13日 03:00
主 题 ：Re: Re:Comments on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement and
Hi Jorge,
Thanks for your response.
If the use case b's route advertisement details are clearly described, It will
not be confusing just because of what it is called.
It is confusing just because its own RT-5 route advertisement is not clear
while the refered route advertisement and
Hi Yubao,
Thanks for taking the time to respond.
It sounds like you are arguing that the reference to bump-in-the-wire in this
draft is confusing. I’m personally ok to remove it for the next version if it
helps.
Although it should already be there, I’ll make sure it is clear that the
document
Hi Yubao,
Thanks for explaining, although I’m afraid we disagree on both things but
that’s ok. Others can chime in as well.
* If you receive an RT1 with ESI-1 and a route-target identifying BD1, the
RT5 with ESI-1 can be resolved to the RT1, hence the traffic will use the IRB
connected
Stéphane,
v04 has just been posted addressing Anoop’s clarification + a good catch by
Jorge on bit-position in DF-Elect extcomm.
Regards,
Luc André
Luc André Burdet | Cisco | laburdet.i...@gmail.com | Tel: +1 613 254 4814
From: "slitkows.i...@gmail.com"
Date: Monday, November 8, 2021 at
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.
Title : EVPN multi-homing port-active load-balancing
Authors : Patrice Brissette
Ali
Hi Saumya,
I agree with Jorge, and do not see how that new I-D applies to the P-A use-case
nor how it should block the progress of P-A WG document?
Based on a quick reading of your use-case you may want to have a look at
