Re: [bess] draft-hb-idr-sr-p2mp-policy (3/10 to 3/24/2022)

2022-03-21 Thread Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
Support adoption of this draft. From: BESS on behalf of Susan Hares Date: Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 6:56 AM To: i...@ietf.org , p...@ietf.org , bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] draft-hb-idr-sr-p2mp-policy (3/10 to 3/24/2022) This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for:

[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-20.txt

2022-03-21 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF. Title : IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN Authors : Ali Sajassi Samir Thoria

Re: [bess] draft-hb-idr-sr-p2mp-policy (3/10 to 3/24/2022)

2022-03-21 Thread Rajarathinam, Saranya (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale)
I support. Thanks Saranya From: pim On Behalf Of Kundu, Tanmoy (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale) Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 9:50 AM To: i...@ietf.org; p...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [pim] [bess] draft-hb-idr-sr-p2mp-policy (3/10 to 3/24/2022) I support. Thanks, Tanmoy From: BESS

Re: [bess] draft-hb-idr-sr-p2mp-policy (3/10 to 3/24/2022)

2022-03-21 Thread Serge Krier (sekrier)
Hi bess & idr WG's, As co-author, I support this draft. Regards, Serge. From: BESS on behalf of Susan Hares Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 15:55 To: i...@ietf.org ; p...@ietf.org ; bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] draft-hb-idr-sr-p2mp-policy (3/10 to

Re: [bess] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-03-21 Thread Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
Thanks Alvaro for comment. I have made the changes as per your comment. And its being uploaded in next few minutes (Tool is throwing some error, so working on it to get it published). Mankamana From: Alvaro Retana Date: Friday, March 11, 2022 at 7:35 AM To: Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) Cc:

Re: [bess] draft-hb-idr-sr-p2mp-policy (3/10 to 3/24/2022)

2022-03-21 Thread Arvind Venkateswaran (arvvenka)
Support. Thanks, Arvind. From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 6:55 AM To: i...@ietf.org; p...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] draft-hb-idr-sr-p2mp-policy (3/10

Re: [bess] draft-hb-idr-sr-p2mp-policy (3/10 to 3/24/2022)

2022-03-21 Thread Kundu, Tanmoy (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale)
I support. Thanks, Tanmoy From: BESS On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 6:55 AM To: i...@ietf.org; p...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] draft-hb-idr-sr-p2mp-policy (3/10 to 3/24/2022) This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for: draft-hb-idr-sr-p2mp-policy from (3/10

Re: [bess] Fwd: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-03-21 Thread Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
Thanks Murray for comment. Attached diff is being published in next 15 min (sorry tool has some issue, so upload is failing). It address your comment . From: Murray S. Kucherawy Date: Monday, March 14, 2022 at 9:43 PM To: John E Drake Cc: BESS , bess-cha...@ietf.org , Mankamana Mishra

[bess] draft-saumvinayak-bess-all-df-bum

2022-03-21 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale)
Dear Saumya and authors, I wanted to follow up on what I mentioned at the mic this morning during the BESS session: 1. You are requesting DF Alg codepoint 2 for this draft, which clashes with https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-08#section-6 – a Working Group

Re: [bess] [Idr] FW: Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-05.txt

2022-03-21 Thread Susan Hares
Jorge: Thank you for your patience in my response. I am sorry I missed this email on bess@ietf.org. [individual contributor hat on] My inline responses are marked [sue]. High-level: 1) Draft content: 1-a) This draft modifies RFC4271 - this should be in the header. I believe

Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-13.txt

2022-03-21 Thread Joel M. Halpern
Top-posting, but copying the rest for cotnext if people need it. What I was trying to suggest is that the presence in the advertissement of an endpoint behavior other than ox be defined to be the signal that the Ingress needs to understand the behavior to use the advertisement. At one

Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-13.txt

2022-03-21 Thread Ketan Talaulikar
Hi Joel, Please check inline below with KT2. On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 4:08 PM Joel Halpern Direct < jmh.dir...@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > In line. > > On 3/21/2022 6:30 AM, Ketan Talaulikar wrote: > > Hi Joel, > > > > Please check inline below. > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 2:19 PM Joel M.

Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-13.txt

2022-03-21 Thread Joel Halpern Direct
In line. On 3/21/2022 6:30 AM, Ketan Talaulikar wrote: Hi Joel, Please check inline below. On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 2:19 PM Joel M. Halpern > wrote: Okay, so for all cases where the argument length is non-zero, the receiver can use the advertisement only

[bess] IDR review of BESS drafts

2022-03-21 Thread Susan Hares
The IDR chairs keep a wiki page listing the drafts BESS has requested feedback on the IDR wiki: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki The page for BESS reviews is: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/Feedback%20for%20BESS%20drafts We have 3 drafts on this list:

Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-13.txt

2022-03-21 Thread Ketan Talaulikar
Hi Joel, Please check inline below. On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 2:19 PM Joel M. Halpern wrote: > Okay, so for all cases where the argument length is non-zero, the > receiver can use the advertisement only if they understand the behavior? > KT> Yes. > > What does it mean for the receiver to

Re: [bess] [Idr] FW: Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-05.txt

2022-03-21 Thread Susan Hares
Jorge: Thank you for the ping! I apologize that I missed your email. I will respond your email later today. Please note this is a personal review since no-one responded to your draft on the idr mail list. (7/27/2021) - my initial draft

Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-13.txt

2022-03-21 Thread Joel M. Halpern
Okay, so for all cases where the argument length is non-zero, the receiver can use the advertisement only if they understand the behavior? What does it mean for the receiver to "use" the behavior when the argument length is zero? What can the receiver do differently based on understanding

Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-13.txt

2022-03-21 Thread Ketan Talaulikar
Hi Joel, Please check inline below. On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 11:13 PM Joel Halpern Direct < jmh.dir...@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > I have reread the draft. let me try asking the quesiton the opposite way. > > 1) If the argument length is zero, then an Ingress PE will always ignore > the SRv6

Re: [bess] [Idr] Review request for draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-11

2022-03-21 Thread wang.yubao2
Thank you for your reply. I have missed this paragraph. That section have described it already. 原始邮件 发件人:KetanTalaulikar 收件人:王玉保10045807; 抄送人:draft-ietf-bess-srv6-servi...@ietf.org;BESS; 日 期 :2022年03月20日 14:59 主 题 :Re: [bess] [Idr] Review request for