Re: [bess] [Lsvr] YANG model for BGP-LS, BGP-LS-VPN and BGP-LS-SPF

[Cross posting to BESS and IDR WG]. > On Nov 3, 2022, at 12:24 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani > wrote: > > Hi WG, > > Earlier last month we posted a draft - draft-mahesh-lsvr-bgp-ls-yang that > defines a YANG model for BGP-LS, BGP-LS-VPN, and BGP-LS-SPF. It augments the > BGP YANG model to add

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-ac-aware-bundling

As a co-author, I support adoption of it and not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Thanks, Samir. From: BESS on behalf of Stephane Litkowski (slitkows) Date: Monday, October 10, 2022 at 1:40 AM To: bess-cha...@ietf.org , bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for

Re: [bess] A doubt about draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-ip-aliasing-05

Hi Sasha, EVPN based RFCs (7432 and 8365) define two types of multi-homing: All-Active and Single-Active. Both of these multi-homing mechanism relies on multi-homing PEs to control loop detection and prevention using DF election and split-horizon filtering.

[bess] Document shepherd review of draft-ietf-bess-pbb-evpn-isid-cmacflush-05

Authors As is customary, I have reviewed this draft. It is clear and readable. I have a few minor comments which I would appreciate if you can address before we move this forward: * It would be helpful in the introduction section if you could expand all acronyms on first use. These are

[bess] A doubt about draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-ip-aliasing-05

Hi, I have doubts regarding applicability of the solution for L3 fast convergence defined in draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-ip-aliasing-05 for the scenarios in which the MH ES in question operates in Single Flow-Active