I support. Thanks Saranya
From: pim On Behalf Of Kundu, Tanmoy (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale) Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 9:50 AM To: i...@ietf.org; p...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [pim] [bess] draft-hb-idr-sr-p2mp-policy (3/10 to 3/24/2022) I support. Thanks, Tanmoy From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 6:55 AM To: i...@ietf.org<mailto:i...@ietf.org>; p...@ietf.org<mailto:p...@ietf.org>; bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org> Subject: [bess] draft-hb-idr-sr-p2mp-policy (3/10 to 3/24/2022) This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for: draft-hb-idr-sr-p2mp-policy from (3/10 to 3/24/2022) You can obtain the draft at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hb-idr-sr-p2mp-policy/ In your comments for this call please consider: 1) Does this technology support the SR P2MP features that distributes candidate paths which connect a multicast distribution tree (tree to leaves). 2) Is the technology correctly specified for the NLRI (AFI/SAFI) and the tunnel encapsulation attribute additions (sections 2 and 3)? 3) Does the P2MP policy operation (section 4) provide enough information for those implementing this technology and those deploying the technology? 4) Do you think this multicast technology is a good Place to start for P2MP policy advertisement via BGP? 5) Do you think this SR P2MP policies should not be advertised via BGP? Cheers, Susan Hares
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
