Hi Yubao,
RFC7432 assumes MPLS transport and hence label fields are 20-bit long.
RFC8365 though assumes NVO transport and the label fields are 24-bit long.
That’s why Ketan mentioned the label field in EVPN routes is 24-bit long.
Thanks.
Jorge
From: BESS on behalf of wang.yub...@zte.com.cn
Hi Yubao,
If it is clear enough then I would avoid adding more text to confuse people
:-)
Thanks again for flagging this issue.
Thanks,
Ketan
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 2:52 PM wrote:
>
> Hi Ketan,
>
>
> Thanks for your further explanations.
>
> Please see in line with [Yubao2].
>
>
> Thanks,
Hi Ketan,
Thanks for your further explanations.
Please see in line with [Yubao2].
Thanks,
Yubao
原始邮件
发件人：KetanTalaulikar
收件人：王玉保10045807;
抄送人：draft-ietf-bess-srv6-servi...@ietf.org;BESS;
日 期 ：2022年06月17日 15:44
主 题 ：Re: Whether the TC/S field of the ESI label field
Hi Yubao,
Please check inline below.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 12:28 PM wrote:
>
> Hi Ketan,
>
>
> Please see in line with [Yubao].
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yubao
>
>
>
> 原始邮件
> *发件人：*KetanTalaulikar
> *收件人：*王玉保10045807;
> *抄送人：*draft-ietf-bess-srv6-servi...@ietf.org;BESS;
> *日 期 ：*2022年06月17日 13:33
>
Hi Ketan,
Please see in line with [Yubao].
Thanks,
Yubao
原始邮件
发件人：KetanTalaulikar
收件人：王玉保10045807;
抄送人：draft-ietf-bess-srv6-servi...@ietf.org;BESS;
日 期 ：2022年06月17日 13:33
主 题 ：Re: Whether the TC/S field of the ESI label field can be used to carry a
portion of
Hi Yubao,
The label fields per RFC7432 are 24-bit. When carrying actual MPLS labels
in them, the high-order 20 bits are to be used per RFC7432. The rest of the
4 bits are not meant for TC/S though. Moreover, for SRv6 we are following
the convention of VXLAN where 24-bit VNI is encoded in the EVPN
Hi Ketan,
Thanks for your clarifications.
But I still don't notice that RFC7432 has said that the label value is 24 bits,
I just found these paragraphs in RFC7432 or rfc7432bis:
The MPLS Label1 field is encoded as 3 octets, where the high-order
20 bits contain the label
Hi Yubao,
Sorry for the delay in response and thanks for catching this issue. We'll
try to correct this during the AUTH48 process.
Please check inline below.
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 8:20 AM wrote:
>
> Hi authors,
>
>
> There may be conflicting description in
>
Hi authors,
There may be conflicting description in
draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-15#section-6.1.1 on the usage of Transposition
Length.
The 24-bit ESI label field of the ESI label extended community
carries the whole or a portion of the Argument part of the SRv6 SID
