Re: [bess] Extra time to reflect on draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane adoption following the IPR disclosure

WG, there is a clear renewed support for this document, so we'll continue as normal. Thank you. M Le 13/04/2017 à 20:04, Martin Vigoureux a écrit : WG Given the IPR disclosed [1] against draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane, we are starting a call for comment specifically to let people

Re: [bess] Extra time to reflect on draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane adoption following the IPR disclosure

I support the adoption of this draft. Best regards Jon -Original Message- From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux Sent: 13 April 2017 19:04 To: BESS <bess@ietf.org> Cc: s...@ietf.org Subject: [bess] Extra time to reflect on draft-mackie-bess-n

Re: [bess] Extra time to reflect on draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane adoption following the IPR disclosure

Support. While I won’t comment on specifics, the IPR appears to only apply to one aspect of the proposed SFC mechanisms. Thanks, Acee On 4/13/17, 2:04 PM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >WG > >Given the IPR disclosed

[bess] Extra time to reflect on draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane adoption following the IPR disclosure

WG Given the IPR disclosed [1] against draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane, we are starting a call for comment specifically to let people express a revised opinion on how draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane should be pursued in BESS. This call for comment is open until the 5th of May