[bess] IETF LC for IDR-ish document (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard

2017-05-06 Thread Robert Raszuk
Hi Warren, This is clearly not unanimous/ not everyone is happy, but (in my view) > there is *rough* consensus for this to progress. > ​The group of users of BGP which this update impacts the most are members of BESS WG (cc-ed) and not IDR WG due to the fact that this proposal applies to all AFI/

Re: [bess] IETF LC for IDR-ish document (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard

2017-05-06 Thread Warren Kumari
[ + authors ] On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Robert Raszuk wrote: > Hi Warren, > >> This is clearly not unanimous/ not everyone is happy, but (in my view) >> there is *rough* consensus for this to progress. > > > The group of users of BGP which this update impacts the most are members > of BESS

Re: [bess] IETF LC for IDR-ish document (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard

2017-05-08 Thread Alvaro Retana (aretana)
Hi! The way I see it, the change proposed in this document is a change to the base BGP spec – as such, many/all users of BGP will be affected. I expect bess participants to also participate in idr – I don’t see the need to extend the discussion. Alvaro. On 5/6/17, 1:53 PM, "Warren Kumari"