All
Had a question related to vxlan BGP EVPN architecture specifications
defined in BGP EVPN NVO3 overlay RFC 8365 and VXLAN data plane RFC 7348.
In a Data Center environment where you have a multiple PODs individual
fabrics per POD connected via a super spine extension using a Multi site
feature
In the description of the vxlan BGP evpn scenario has a typo on the
multisite feature segmented LSP inter pod with the RT auto rewrite which is
similar to MPLS inter-as option b not a.
Kind regards
Gyan
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 5:57 PM Gyan Mishra wrote:
>
> All
>
> Had a question related to vx
Slight clarification with the arp traffic. What I meant was broadcast
traffic translated into BUM traffic with the EVPN architecture is there any
way to reduce the amount of BUM traffic with a data center design
requirement with vlan anywhere sprawl with 1000s of type 2 Mac mobility
routes being l
Gyan,
"Multi site” is not really an IETF terminology, this is a solution implement by
NX-OS, there’s a draft though. Its main functionality is to localize VxLAN
tunnels and provide segmented path vs end2end full mesh of VxLAN tunnels
(participating in the same EVI). We are talking HER here.
The
Hi Jeff
Yes - Cisco has a draft for multi site for use cases capability of inter
pod or inter site segmented path between desperate POD fabrics intra DC or
as DCI option inter DC without MPLS. The segmentation localizes BUM
traffic and has border gateway DF election for BUM traffic that is
segmen
: Friday, April 24, 2020 at 5:21 AM
To: Jeff Tantsura
Cc: BESS
Subject: Re: [bess] VXLAN BGP EVPN Question
Hi Jeff
Yes - Cisco has a draft for multi site for use cases capability of inter pod or
inter site segmented path between desperate POD fabrics intra DC or as DCI
option inter DC without
anks.
> Jorge
>
> From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf
> of Gyan Mishra mailto:hayabusa...@gmail.com>>
> Date: Friday, April 24, 2020 at 5:21 AM
> To: Jeff Tantsura mailto:jefftant.i...@gmail.com>>
> Cc: BESS mailto:bess@ietf.org>>
CI, you can perfectly use it for inter-pod connectivity.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
> *From: *BESS on behalf of Gyan Mishra <
> hayabusa...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Friday, April 24, 2020 at 5:21 AM
> *To: *Jeff Tantsura
> *Cc: *BESS
> *Subject
f Tantsura
Subject: Re: [bess] VXLAN BGP EVPN Question
Hi Jorge
I read through the draft and it sounds this vxlan segmentation is similar to
multi site segmented multi part LSP used for DCI. How does this option
compare or contrast with the multi site draft below.
With DCI evpn overlay you
gt;>
Date: Friday, April 24, 2020 at 3:54 PM
To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)"
mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com>>
Cc: BESS mailto:bess@ietf.org>>, Jeff Tantsura
mailto:jefftant.i...@gmail.com>>
Subject: Re: [bess] VXLAN BGP EVPN Question
Hi Jorge
I r
ference that must be cleared
> first.
>
> Thanks.
> Jorge
>
> *From: *Gyan Mishra
> *Date: *Friday, April 24, 2020 at 3:54 PM
> *To: *"Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" >
> *Cc: *BESS , Jeff Tantsura
> *Subject: *Re: [bess] VXLAN BGP EVPN Question
>
cisco.com"
Cc: BESS , Jeff Tantsura , "Rabadan,
Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)"
Subject: Re: [bess] VXLAN BGP EVPN Question
+ Ali
Lukas
I noticed that Ali was on the multi site draft which I which expired in 2017
around the same time the DCI overlay draft was submitted. I
t; any extra flooding.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
> *From: *Gyan Mishra
> *Date: *Saturday, April 25, 2020 at 8:45 AM
> *To: *"Lukas Krattiger (lkrattig)" , "
> saja...@cisco.com"
> *Cc: *BESS , Jeff Tantsura ,
> "Rabadan, Jorge
own
>> traffic can be sent to the redundant GWs. So this failure won’t generate
>> any extra flooding.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Jorge
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Gyan Mishra
>> *Date: *Saturday, April 25, 2020 at 8:45 AM
>> *To:
: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)"
Cc: BESS , Jeff Tantsura , "Lukas
Krattiger (lkrattig)" , "saja...@cisco.com"
Subject: Re: [bess] VXLAN BGP EVPN Question
Jorge
In the BGP EVPN NVO RFC 8365 there are controls built in for Mac flooding
related to i
Cc: *BESS , Jeff Tantsura ,
> "Lukas Krattiger (lkrattig)" , "saja...@cisco.com" <
> saja...@cisco.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [bess] VXLAN BGP EVPN Question
>
>
>
>
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
> In the BGP EVPN NVO RFC 8365 there are controls built
23, 2021 6:21 PM
To: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) ; BESS ; Jeff
Tantsura ; John E Drake ; Rabadan,
Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
Subject: Fwd: [bess] VXLAN BGP EVPN Question
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Authors
Do we know if this draft will progress to RFC?
https://tools.ietf.org
21 PM
> *To:* Ali Sajassi (sajassi) ; BESS ;
> Jeff Tantsura ; John E Drake ;
> Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
> *Subject:* Fwd: [bess] VXLAN BGP EVPN Question
>
>
>
> *[External Email. Be cautious of content]*
>
>
>
>
>
> Authors
>
>
>
> D
E Drake
Cc: Jeff Tantsura , "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)"
, "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)" ,
BESS
Subject: Re: [bess] VXLAN BGP EVPN Question
That’s fabulous news that everyone has implemented!!
Unfortunate on the red tape with the turn around to RFC.
Kind Regards
Gyan
On Sa
RFC Editor queue for over three years.
>
>
>
> Yours Irrespectively,
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> *From:* Gyan Mishra
> *Sent:* Friday, April 23, 2021 6:21 PM
> *To:* Ali Sajassi (sajassi) ; BESS ;
> Jeff Ta
t;>
>>
>> Juniper Business Use Only
>> From: Gyan Mishra
>> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2021 6:21 PM
>> To: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) ; BESS ; Jeff
>> Tantsura ; John E Drake ;
>> Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
>> Subject: Fwd: [be
er Business Use Only
>>
>> *From:* Gyan Mishra
>> *Sent:* Friday, April 23, 2021 6:21 PM
>> *To:* Ali Sajassi (sajassi) ; BESS ;
>> Jeff Tantsura ; John E Drake ;
>> Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
>> *Subject:* Fwd: [bess] VXLAN BGP EVPN Question
;>
>>> Yours Irrespectively,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Juniper Business Use Only
>>>
>>> *From:* Gyan Mishra
>>> *Sent:* Friday, April 23, 2021 6:2
23 matches
Mail list logo
