Also, one additional issue which I think the document should address.
Since this document only introduces one dataplane option. But it requires
that control plane signal options in the order that the receiver would like
to
see them, and the sender must honor that. How does this work as
I have reviewed the doc and have the following comments.
Anoop
==
authors:
Jorge is listed as working at Juniper but with a Nokia address. :)
Throughout the document:
Mixed use of GENEVE and Geneve.
Suggest making it consistent (should be Geneve per the Geneve draft).
There are also several
;
> Thank you!
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
> *From: *slitkows.i...@gmail.com
> *Date: *Monday, July 13, 2020 at 1:46 PM
> *To: *bess@ietf.org , draft-ietf-bess-evpn-gen...@ietf.org
>
> *Cc: *bess-cha...@ietf.org , 'idr@ietf. org' <
> i...@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *W
and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-geneve-01
Hello WG,
This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-geneve-01 [1].
This poll runs until * the 27th Of July *.
We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this
Document
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
On Jul 13, 2020, 7:46 AM -0700, slitkows.i...@gmail.com, wrote:
>
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>
> Hello WG,
>
> This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-geneve-01 [1].
>
> This poll runs until * the 27th Of July *..
>
poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-geneve-01
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Hello WG,
This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-geneve-01 [1].
This poll runs until * the 27th Of July *.
We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies
Hello WG,
This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-geneve-01 [1].
This poll runs until * the 27th Of July *.
We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance
