Sami,
Besides what Ali says, for your second question note that in the use-case 5.4
we are explicitly avoiding GW-IP non-zero plus router’s mac in the same update:
"The Router's MAC Extended Community MUST be sent if the associated
RT-5's GW IP Address is zero.”
Thanks.
Jorge
On
Sami,
There are intended for different scenarios. When a subnet is sitting
behind a TS, there is no need to advertise label/VNI in RT5 for that
subnet because it gets resolved via label/VNI associated with RT2 for that
TS. In other scenarios, where subnet gets directly advertised by PE (e.g.,
no
Hi Jorge,
In some of the use case sections in the draft, there is no mention of the
label/VNI that will be associated with RT-5.
As well if the router-mac will be associated with RT-5 and the GW-IP will be
set, why do we need to advertise those again in RT-2?
Thanks,
Sami
