Fletch;285080 Wrote:
My repository is still available as per the original post in this
thread.
Thank you very much - I am already using it. Thanks.
Dirk
--
pip2000
Currently using SB3, SC7
Slimserver since Nov 2007
I'm trying to click the here link on this page.
http://www.slimdevices.com/dev_nightly.html
This is the actual link:
http://www.slimdevices.com/redir.html?http://svn.slimdevices.com/*checkout*/trunk/server/Changelog7.html
--
Jeff Flowerday
Jeff Flowerday;285206 Wrote:
I'm trying to click the here link on this page.
http://www.slimdevices.com/dev_nightly.html
This is the actual link:
http://www.slimdevices.com/redir.html?http://svn.slimdevices.com/*checkout*/trunk/server/Changelog7.html
Right, that won't anymore.
Index of /downloads/nightly/latest/trunk
Icon Name Last modified Size
Description[DIR] Parent Directory
-
[ ] SqueezeCenter-7.0.1-18170.dmg30-Mar-2008 00:17 25M
Mac OS X Disk Image
[TXT]
After migrating to a new computer, I had the same issue crop up once
again. Deleting all the old versions of Slimserver and Squeezecenter
didn't do the trick this time (including the cache files) so the final
step necessary was to delete the old user preferences found in:
rm
JJZolx;284789 Wrote:
What's the status of development work being done on Transporter
firmware? I hope there are no thoughts toward actually ever releasing
firmware 40. It seems to have introduced even more serious problems
than the ones that it attempted to fix.
No, firmware 40 will not
I have tried serveral times now. After entering the encryption key it
takes 12 sec to connect to the network - last step is to get an IP. But
no matter when I shout down the router - the only reaction I get is
Connection problem Try again - or choose another network.
--
Kim.T
HP T5700 Thin
Kim.T;285346 Wrote:
I have tried serveral times now. After entering the encryption key it
takes 12 sec to connect to the network - last step is to get an IP. But
no matter when I shout down the router - the only reaction I get is
Connection problem Try again - or choose another network.
OK,
seanadams wrote:
JJZolx;284789 Wrote:
What's the status of development work being done on Transporter
firmware? I hope there are no thoughts toward actually ever releasing
firmware 40. It seems to have introduced even more serious problems
than the ones that it attempted to fix.
No,
The new Transporter features that Sean's been working hard are
targetted to the 7.1 release of SqueezeCenter. Version 40 (and its
follow-ons) will appear in those nightly builds.
The 7.0.1 version will include some minor, critical bug fixes to the
Transporter firmware. Look for an update
dean;285384 Wrote:
Unfortunately, the firmware version numbers go up in only one
dimension, so you may see confusing firmware numbers in the two
branches;
This might be a good time to fix that, now that the server version
branching has been overhauled.
--
JJZolx
Jim
andyg;268574 Wrote:
50x50 png (web thumbnails)
56x56 png (Jive thumbnails)
56x56 gd (Jive thumbnails)
thumbSize || 100x100 png (larger web thumbnails)
Actually, we can probably get rid of the 56x56 png since Jive only
uses gd images now...
Hi Andy,
maybe a stupid question, but
On Mar 30, 2008, at 8:59 PM, elite1967 wrote:
andyg;268574 Wrote:
50x50 png (web thumbnails)
56x56 png (Jive thumbnails)
56x56 gd (Jive thumbnails)
thumbSize || 100x100 png (larger web thumbnails)
Actually, we can probably get rid of the 56x56 png since Jive only
uses gd images now...
Andy, With recent changes to images used for the Jive interface, have
PNGs been completely eliminated for thumbnail use?
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7642
How is the performance looking?
--
JJZolx
Jim
On Mar 30, 2008, at 11:13 PM, JJZolx wrote:
Andy, With recent changes to images used for the Jive interface, have
PNGs been completely eliminated for thumbnail use?
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7642
How is the performance looking?
PNGs were gone a while back, but we have
andyg;285532 Wrote:
PNGs were gone a while back, but we have just switched to JPEG from GD
and and the performance is looking much better. :) 56x56 JPEGs are
about 1.5-2K whereas the uncompressed GD files were 12K. So they
transfer much faster and render almost as fast as GD images.
16 matches
Mail list logo
