JJZolx;411908 Wrote:
> Size differences aren't a problem. The thumbnails are scaled to a
> common size and I can't think of anywhere in the interface where you
> view two originals side by side.
>
That's not the point. The problem is that depending on the original
size the result of scaling wi
bhaagensen;410997 Wrote:
> - As SC uses no standardised location to source covers from there is
> potential for deviations in quality, colors, size, aspect-ratio etc.
> This looks bad.
> - Sometimes covers have white, or some other kind of border. Again
> bad.
> - In general the varying image qua
Philip Meyer;411842 Wrote:
> Except that it doesn't detect differences between accented characters
> and normal letters, so for example José Gonzaléz is equivalent to Jose
> Gonzalez.
I wasn't aware of that one.
Completely agree with you Philip.
--
funkstar
---
>Yup, thats correct, thats how SC works. Unlike most other software, it
>makes no assumptions about your tagging in that regard.
>
Except that it doesn't detect differences between accented characters and
normal letters, so for example José Gonzaléz is equivalent to Jose Gonzalez.
If you have two
Hello
Sinbce the installation of SqueezeCenter 7.4-25744, no new music is
scanned any more. Standard I have only a subfolder scnanned with FLAC
files, /volume1/music/FLAC/ .
I have tried the following:
- Add a new sub-directory to /volume1/music/FLAC. No result after
scanning. Nor progress visi
Andy, i respect you, (and like you) so please respect this:
i am not a developer, but i am someone who is pretty good at
identifying and reporting bugs, and i know that if i did so with you,
you would be timely in response and would not question the truthfulness
of my report. (not saying i'm inf
get over your high horse condescension to me, who asked you anyway? way
to take the thread off topic. ever hear of a PM?
sure they are busy, and i made it PLAIN i don't expect immediate
action, read my last post again... on the other hand, there's no
reason for this to languish either, and if
On Mar 31, 2009, at 12:24 PM, MrSinatra wrote:
>
> i don't know who you are, but my guess is you don't like being ignored
> for days at a time, nor do you like having your truthfulness
> questioned.
>
> well guess what, neither do i.
>
> i was not the first to be rude. i don't feel i was rude, i
Get over your feeling of entitlement. They are terribly BUSY.
--
MrC
MrC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=468
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=61611
_
i don't know who you are, but my guess is you don't like being ignored
for days at a time, nor do you like having your truthfulness
questioned.
well guess what, neither do i.
i was not the first to be rude. i don't feel i was rude, i'm just
tired of the back of the hand.
--
MrSinatra
www.li
MrSinatra;411675 Wrote:
> come on, thats a pretty lame cop out. i'm totally fine with it being
> too soon for the official 7.3.3, and i realize this isn't a MAJOR
> issue, but this idea that SC is gonna have some features for some
> users/browsers, and not other users/browsers, EVEN THOUGH the "
Yup, thats correct, thats how SC works. Unlike most other software, it
makes no assumptions about your tagging in that regard.
There are some very good taggers that should be able to correct your
whole collection with some basic scripting or rules. Case correction is
a pretty common function on p
In my large collection (130K+ tracks), SC seems to read Field tags in a
special way, so that "Album Name" is considered different from "album
name" leaving me with two diffrent entries for each album/artist if
different caps are being used. As normal tagging applications like
iTunes or JRiver MC t
mherger;411669 Wrote:
> > 1. do you or do you not believe it works with ver 24731??? you
> > expressed skepticism.
>
> I would be surprised, because a.) we're currently enforcing IE7
> compatibility mode and b.) the only change I could find should not
> break
> it (storing the panel's width
> 1. do you or do you not believe it works with ver 24731??? you
> expressed skepticism.
I would be surprised, because a.) we're currently enforcing IE7
compatibility mode and b.) the only change I could find should not break
it (storing the panel's width in a cookie or not):
http://svn.slim
ok, so while its not reflected in this thread, you now see the light
regarding the bugs, (mine isn't a dupe).
however, you haven't answered my questions.
1. do you or do you not believe it works with ver 24731??? you
expressed skepticism.
2. if you do believe it, then why doesn't it work now?
> and just b/c it "never reliably worked" doesn't mean it shouldn't now.
Correct. But it's a dupe. It's been reported before.
--
Michael
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
can u elaborate on that???
it does reliably work with ver 24731
it doesn't now.
so what changed?
and just b/c it "never reliably worked" doesn't mean it shouldn't now.
IE8 is out in its final form, it supports web standards, SC should now
do with it what it does with other browsers.
--
MrS
MelonMonkey;411530 Wrote:
>
>
> It would be a decent idea to allow Slim Center to read from its DB as
> it does from iTunes, but that's likely where you'd want to end
> integration.
that is exactly what i am looking for.
--
matthijskoopmans
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mattkoop
L
I'm sorry. My mistake. I had wav listed as a disabled file type.
:-(
MC
--
ModelCitizen
On average people have fewer than two feet.
http://www.last.fm/user/ModelCitizen
ModelCitizen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.c
20 matches
Mail list logo
