[SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 still doesn't run on WIN (XP, SP3)

2010-04-03 Thread frank1969
Hi, yesterday I tried out 7.5 trunk (30462) and 7.6 (30458) on the exact same database. Same result since the start of 7.5 embedded (!) - 7.5 truns works, 7.6 doesn't (posted this one earlier but got the response, Windows build are "experimental" - are they still). Description: 7.5: running "de

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 still doesn't run on WIN (XP, SP3)

2010-04-03 Thread Phil Leigh
frank1969;529931 Wrote: > Hi, > yesterday I tried out 7.5 trunk (30462) and 7.6 (30458) on the exact > same database. > > Same result since the start of 7.5 embedded (!) - 7.5 truns works, 7.6 > doesn't (posted this one earlier but got the response, Windows build > are "experimental" - are they

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.5.0 : "Problem: Can't open file for:"

2010-04-03 Thread copperstate
sbb;529866 Wrote: > vielen dank Copperstate! > Did you notice as well that the files are streamed as Quicktime videos? > I can't remember if that was already the case with the 7.4.x versions I > used in the past... Unfortunately it was only a temporary solution, it broke again later on ... :(

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.5.0 : "Problem: Can't open file for:"

2010-04-03 Thread sbb
you mean re-converting your files with itunes 9.1? -- sbb sbb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14322 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=71623 ___

[SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 nightly r30469 fails to start on Win7 x64

2010-04-03 Thread cbemoore
The following error is displayed at startup: "The procedure entry point Perl_croak_xs_usage could not be located in the dynamic link library perl510.dll." -- cbemoore cbemoore's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/memb

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 nightly r30469 fails to start on Win7 x64

2010-04-03 Thread cbemoore
I've just tried rolling back to yesterday's nightly (r30465) and it works perfectly. So the problem must have been introduced within the last day. -- cbemoore cbemoore's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?us

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 nightly r30469 fails to start on Win7 x64

2010-04-03 Thread cbemoore
I've just tried rolling back to yesterday's nightly (r30465) and it works perfectly. So the problem must have been introduced within the last day. -- cbemoore cbemoore's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?us

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 nightly r30469 fails to start on Win7 x64

2010-04-03 Thread Andy Grundman
On Apr 3, 2010, at 11:58 AM, cbemoore wrote: > > The following error is displayed at startup: > > "The procedure entry point Perl_croak_xs_usage could not be located in > the dynamic link library perl510.dll." OK this is probably my fault, I assume 7.5 works fine?

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 nightly r30469 fails to start on Win7 x64

2010-04-03 Thread andyg
Yeah OK I know what the problem is. I compiled a new module against ActivePerl 5.10.1 and this is apparently not backwards-compatible. I'll recompile against 5.10.0. -- andyg andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.co

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 nightly r30469 fails to start on Win7 x64

2010-04-03 Thread slate
Then we know who is going to give cake this afternoon ;-) -- slate Main: Duet -> Beresford Caiman -> Carver A-500x -> B&W 704 Office: Duet -> Technics SU-V50 -> Stax SR84 Pro Server: Zotac IONITX-A, 4 GB, 1 TB WD EADS, Win7 w. 7.5e --

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 still doesn't run on WIN (XP, SP3)

2010-04-03 Thread iPhone
frank1969;529931 Wrote: > Hi, > yesterday I tried out 7.5 trunk (30462) and 7.6 (30458) on the exact > same database. > > Same result since the start of 7.5 embedded (!) - 7.5 truns works, 7.6 > doesn't (posted this one earlier but got the response, Windows build > are "experimental" - are they

[SlimDevices: Beta] Which build to follow on Debian

2010-04-03 Thread Millwood
Without my noticing, the debian unstable build became 7.6.0. I installed 30465 which works just the way my last 7.5.0 worked. 7.5.0 has been good for so long, even though called unstable, that I've been using it. So - is 7.6.0 going to be really unstable for a while? If so, when will 7.5.x mov

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 still doesn't run on WIN (XP, SP3)

2010-04-03 Thread JJZolx
iPhone;530014 Wrote: > In another post didn't AndyG or Michael say that the MySQL module wasn't > in the new 7.6 truck yet. I believe 7.6 is SQLite based only at this > time. You can configure it to use MySQL and it will try, but there's something definitely screwed up. You must use SQLite at t

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 trunk - first go

2010-04-03 Thread signor_rossi
Can we expect to see 7.6 in the debian unstable repository sooner or later? Thanks, using 7.5e for a while now and it works great. -- signor_rossi signor_rossi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=119

[SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6.0 - r30469 prevents SqueezePlay/iPeng from browsing into albums

2010-04-03 Thread dsdreamer
Under SQLite a few albums can't be browsed using SqueezePlay after a successful scan, whereas under MySQL no albums whatsoever can be browsed using SqueezePlay or iPeng. Both DB backends allow the webUI to browse albums, add to tracks to playlists and perform all other related operations correctly

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 nightly r30469 fails to start on Win7 x64

2010-04-03 Thread JJZolx
I'm seeing something running the non-compiled code with ActivePerl 5.10.0, build 1005. The server fails to start, with the following message in a dialog box (run from the command line): > > The procedure entry point Perl_croak_xs_usage could not be located in > the dynamic link library perl510.

[SlimDevices: Beta] panelWidth cookie in Default web skin

2010-04-03 Thread JJZolx
The last bit of 'bug 8705' (http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=8705): The browser fails to remember the playlist panel width for more than a few days. I see this often, as I have a number of SbS servers configured and don't visit each one regularly. In Firefox it's easy to examine brow

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] panelWidth cookie in Default web skin

2010-04-03 Thread Michael Herger
> What I see is that each cookie is given an expiration date exactly 1 > year from the current date, _except_ for the panel width cookie, which > is dated just 1 week in the future. Which explains the problem. Maybe > not important, but I also note that the name given to this cookie is > unusual,