>Is this the full text search in 7.9?
>
Maybe it is. Didn't realise that was going to be for normal searches. I
thought that was something to do with a new search option or advanced search
and the introduction of songs or albums results mode. Is there any way to turn
it off?
Perhaps not so b
I think Michael will have to comment on the rules for sorting the
results. That's usually the complicated aspect of full text search,
getting the sorting right.
---
learn more about iPeng, the iPhone and iPad remote for the Squeezebox
and
Logitech UE Smart Radio as well as iPeng Party, the free
Is this the full text search in 7.9?
Maybe it is.
Most likely it is. Your description sounds exactly like a FTS issue.
Perhaps not so bad if the search results with the search string in the title
were to appear at the top of the results
That _should_ be the case already. Are you running t
Hm, interesting thing about "Love". Does that mean the band "Love" is
never going to be found or did I misunderstand something?
---
learn more about iPeng, the iPhone and iPad remote for the Squeezebox
and
Logitech UE Smart Radio as well as iPeng Party, the free Party-App,
at penguinlovesmusic
>Most likely it is. Your description sounds exactly like a FTS issue.
>
Yes, I'm sure that's it now I have had a play.
>> Perhaps not so bad if the search results with the search string in the title
>> were to appear at the top of the results
>
>That _should_ be the case already. Are you running
Kind of remember these kind of issues from the infamous "The The" bug in
iPeng 1.0.1 (iPeng 1.0 at the time did already contain special handling
for "The The" but 1.0.1 re-introduced a bug that crashed the App if you
had an album by "The The" and the App Store comments still have some
references t
Philip Meyer wrote:
>
> I'm not convinced I like it too much, TBH. A useful feature to have,
> but not as the default for Albums search.
>
Sure _you_ are not convinced. But believe me, those other 99.9% of users
out there just cried crap for the last 6 years because Squeezebox did
anything ot
That said: it's just as weird to search for a category, usually with a
full-text search you would expect a result-agnostic search returning all
kind of results and then maybe a way to filter what you get. No need for
27 different "search" boxes in a UI, one would be just fine...
---
learn more
Under plugins tab on web UI I am unable to add more than one additional
repository. It simply doesn't save the second entry when I press
apply.
Using nightly on debian (7.9.0~1421917265).
Cheers,
Matthew
mattwire's Profi
Hm, interesting thing about "Love". Does that mean the band "Love" is
never going to be found or did I misunderstand something?
Ok, "title" was wrong/too simple. I meant to say album- or track-title
(for albums or tracks, respectively) or the artist name (for artists).
The value you'd find in
Maybe you could share your
library.db file with me, and I'll look in to the particularities of your
data once I'm back.
Sure, where would you like me to send it?
Send me a link to a downloadable file to michael ät slimdevices dott
com. Thanks!
--
Michael
>Sure _you_ are not convinced. But believe me, those other 99.9% of users
>out there just cried crap for the last 6 years because Squeezebox did
>anything other than full-text search.
>
I can't remember it being mentioned in the forum or bugzilla before.
I'm not against full text search, it will h
Philip Meyer wrote:
>
> I can't remember it being mentioned in the forum or bugzilla before.
>
It's been mentioned in the forums, it ranks under the top 10 feature
requests I get for iPeng and - most importantly - it's probably the #1
argument of people telling me what a crappy, outdated syste
>It's been mentioned in the forums
I don't remember many conversations about search in all the time I've
participated on the mailing list/forum.
>it's probably the #1 argument of people telling me what a crappy,
>outdated system the Squeezebox system is.
Really? Ridiculous!
In the example given
Philip Meyer wrote:
>
> In the example given for searching "hurry love supremes" such that Phil
> Collins doesn't come up, what's the harm of searching for "hurry
> love"...
>
For the third time: you are still arguing implementation details of
something that is in alpha state at best against a
Fantastic! The improvement in searching really makes the google suggest
style searching really work well for me.
In the past if the search was too long the results would some times lag,
and be in some in between state. Now I am able look for whole song
titles and the results come back fast witho
Fulltext search is optional. Just disable the plugin if you don't like it.
Am 28.01.2015 um 02:51 schrieb Phil Meyer :
>> It's been mentioned in the forums
> I don't remember many conversations about search in all the time I've
> participated on the mailing list/forum.
>
>> it's probably the
Well, I used to! I still get a list of artists that have the word "Rainbow" in their name, and
Songs with "Rainbow" in their title. However, the Albums results includes albums where there are
songs that contain "Rainbow", irrespective of the album title.
I think this is the result of a bug I
Philip Meyer wrote:
> I'm not convinced I like it too much, TBH. A useful feature to have,
> but not as the default for Albums search.
Yeah, I tested Full Text Search for a while and eventually came to the
conclusion that I greatly prefer the simpler substring search behavior,
so I disabled the
19 matches
Mail list logo