[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: A couple of minor bugs in 6.5b1

2006-08-28 Thread Robin Bowes
cbemoore wrote: > I've noticed a couple of minor bugs in 6.5b1 recently. If anyone else > can confirm they're seeing the same behaviour, I'll file a bug. > > Firstly, the new 0-100 volume control doesn't quite seem to work > properly. When you increase the volume, it goes 0 1 2 3, but when you > d

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: A couple of minor bugs in 6.5b1

2006-08-28 Thread cbemoore
kdf;131728 Wrote: > that's not a bug, so much. it's the remaining time in your song. If > playing, the sleep function adds an option for "after this song" > -kdf Aha - I understand. That's a great idea! But "Sleeping in 3.1236465433463 minutes" is totally non-intuitive. Is there any way it c

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: A couple of minor bugs in 6.5b1

2006-08-28 Thread Robin Bowes
cbemoore wrote: > kdf;131728 Wrote: >> that's not a bug, so much. it's the remaining time in your song. If >> playing, the sleep function adds an option for "after this song" >> -kdf > > Aha - I understand. That's a great idea! > > But "Sleeping in 3.1236465433463 minutes" is totally non-intu

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: A couple of minor bugs in 6.5b1

2006-08-28 Thread sbjaerum
kdf;131728 Wrote: > On 28-Aug-06, at 3:01 AM, cbemoore wrote: > > > > Secondly, the sleep function sometimes gives strange values. The > first > > time you press "sleep" on the remote, the SB displays "Sleeping in > > 3.1236465433463 minutes". Subsequent keypresses correctly display > 15, > > 30,

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: A couple of minor bugs in 6.5b1

2006-08-29 Thread Robin Bowes
Robin Bowes wrote: > cbemoore wrote: >> I've noticed a couple of minor bugs in 6.5b1 recently. If anyone else >> can confirm they're seeing the same behaviour, I'll file a bug. >> >> Firstly, the new 0-100 volume control doesn't quite seem to work >> properly. When you increase the volume, it goes

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: A couple of minor bugs in 6.5b1

2006-08-30 Thread cbemoore
I've just tried the latest nightly, and the first "sleep" option is now "Sleeping at end of song". Much better - thanks for the fix!! But the following options are now 14, 29, 44, 59 and 89 minutes. It would be much cleaner to display round numbers - is there any way they can be changed back to t

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Re: A couple of minor bugs in 6.5b1

2006-08-28 Thread kdf
Quoting sbjaerum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: kdf;131728 Wrote: On 28-Aug-06, at 3:01 AM, cbemoore wrote: > > Secondly, the sleep function sometimes gives strange values. The first > time you press "sleep" on the remote, the SB displays "Sleeping in > 3.1236465433463 minutes". Subsequent keypresses co