Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 still doesn't run on WIN (XP, SP3)

2010-04-04 Thread frank1969
Phil Leigh;530163 Wrote: > You need to check scanner.log and server.log... I did but found nothing helpful. Anyone does? SCANNER.LOG: [10-04-04 09:52:08.8593] main::main (202) Starting Squeezebox Server scanner (v7.6.0, r30458, Thu Apr 1 05:29:26 PDT 2010) perl 5.01 [10-04-04 09:52:11.547

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 still doesn't run on WIN (XP, SP3)

2010-04-04 Thread frank1969
Phil Leigh;530163 Wrote: > You need to check scanner.log and server.log... I did but found nothing helpful. Anyone does? SCANNER.LOG: [10-04-04 09:52:08.8593] main::main (202) Starting Squeezebox Server scanner (v7.6.0, r30458, Thu Apr 1 05:29:26 PDT 2010) perl 5.01 [10-04-04 09:52:11.547

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 still doesn't run on WIN (XP, SP3)

2010-04-04 Thread Mnyb
frank1969;530159 Wrote: > > > Just tried the last nightly build from today - here 7.6 doesn't start > with error mesage (translated from german) "The procedure jumppoint > "Perl_croak_xs_usage" wasn't found in DLL "perl510.dll". > > Anything seems to be wrong - changed back to 7.5.0 nightly -

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 still doesn't run on WIN (XP, SP3)

2010-04-04 Thread JJZolx
Mnyb;530172 Wrote: > http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=76768&highlight=Perl_croak_xs_usage > > *Perl_croak_xs_usage* is the smoking gun. > > Maybe next nightly version will work better for you on windows I kind of doubt it. That bug keeps SbS from starting at all, so it wouldn't

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 still doesn't run on WIN (XP, SP3)

2010-04-04 Thread Mnyb
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=76768&highlight=Perl_croak_xs_usage *Perl_croak_xs_usage* is the smoking gun. Maybe next nightly version will work better for you on windows -- Mnyb Main hifi: SB3 (soon to re

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 still doesn't run on WIN (XP, SP3)

2010-04-04 Thread Webkemmi
Same here with 7.6 sqlite - database has been scanned and a lot of songs were missing. Suddenly the scanner started again, added some albums and stopped again. Then SBS crashed intermittently. 7.6 has been unusable on Windows Home Server for me. Went back to 7.5 which runs well. Stefan -- Webk

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 still doesn't run on WIN (XP, SP3)

2010-04-04 Thread Phil Leigh
You need to check scanner.log and server.log... -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... SB Touch Beta (wired) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W - MF Triplethreat(Audiocom full mods) - Linn 5103 - Aktiv 5.1

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 still doesn't run on WIN (XP, SP3)

2010-04-04 Thread frank1969
No, unfortunately the SQLite "branch" doesn't work either. What I did: - changed to SQLite - restarted server - ran an complete rescan after about 4 hours it showed: Version: 7.6.0 - r30458 @ Thu Apr 1 05:29:26 PDT 2010 Betriebssystem: Windows XP - DE - cp1252 Plattformarchitektur: 586 Perl-Ver

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 still doesn't run on WIN (XP, SP3)

2010-04-03 Thread JJZolx
iPhone;530014 Wrote: > In another post didn't AndyG or Michael say that the MySQL module wasn't > in the new 7.6 truck yet. I believe 7.6 is SQLite based only at this > time. You can configure it to use MySQL and it will try, but there's something definitely screwed up. You must use SQLite at t

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 still doesn't run on WIN (XP, SP3)

2010-04-03 Thread iPhone
frank1969;529931 Wrote: > Hi, > yesterday I tried out 7.5 trunk (30462) and 7.6 (30458) on the exact > same database. > > Same result since the start of 7.5 embedded (!) - 7.5 truns works, 7.6 > doesn't (posted this one earlier but got the response, Windows build > are "experimental" - are they

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] 7.6 still doesn't run on WIN (XP, SP3)

2010-04-03 Thread Phil Leigh
frank1969;529931 Wrote: > Hi, > yesterday I tried out 7.5 trunk (30462) and 7.6 (30458) on the exact > same database. > > Same result since the start of 7.5 embedded (!) - 7.5 truns works, 7.6 > doesn't (posted this one earlier but got the response, Windows build > are "experimental" - are they