On 16/11/2010 9:22 PM, Alex Combas wrote:
> But I'm not a lawyer so my opinion is just an opinion.
One must always also remember that, even if you are a lawyer, claims
made about the GPL are still opinions until tested in court. It is one
of the reasons commercial companies avoid linking to GPL c
Already reopened, but for the future commenting on the closed report will
do just fine.
janne
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:00:04 +0200, Remo Pini wrote:
> Hi all
>
> If I think a bug has been closed in error (#23820), is there a way to
> have it reopened?
>
> Cheers
>
> Remo
>
> ___
Hi all
If I think a bug has been closed in error (#23820), is there a way to
have it reopened?
Cheers
Remo
___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Michael McLay wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Ton Roosendaal wrote:
>
> > For temporary docs, work in progress, and other interesting
> > development updates, both blender.org cms and wiki fail to satisfy.
> >
>
>
> > I think of setting up a blog (wordp
I think this mechanism Alex brought up is an important one to consider. In
addition I've referenced some additional FSF documentation about GPL vs
LGPL.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Alex Combas wrote:
> > The wording here, even in the case of a manual exception, refers to the
> > non-GPL cod
Hey all,
Just wondering if anyone on the list is at the SuperComputing 2010
conference in New Orleans. I've already met several users and fans of
Blender, but it would be cool to meet some devs :) If anybody is here we
could get coffee or a po'boy!
--
Ian Johnson
http://enja.org
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Ton Roosendaal wrote:
> For temporary docs, work in progress, and other interesting
> development updates, both blender.org cms and wiki fail to satisfy.
>
> I think of setting up a blog (wordpress) code.blender.org, with
> following features;
> - cool design (o
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:30 PM, David Jeske wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Campbell Barton >wrote:
>
> @Alex Combas - ...
>
> The wording here, even in the case of a manual exception, refers to the
> non-GPL code as a "library" and implies it's existance before the authoring
> of
On 16/11/10 7:10 PM, Nathan Letwory wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 16.11.2010 4:39, Mike S wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> just wondering if anyone can see this bug report at all? It seems to
>> have vanished (not just closed or on hold but gone for me). I was going
>> to a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16.11.2010 4:39, Mike S wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just wondering if anyone can see this bug report at all? It seems to
> have vanished (not just closed or on hold but gone for me). I was going
> to add some more information about other related behavio
10 matches
Mail list logo
