Re: [Bf-committers] Proposal for moving io scripts into addons

Hi Luca, while having a clearer division between core and community scripts could be good I don't there is one thing I don't agree with. >From what I can see with your proposal: current bundled "addons" become "extensions" and can be enabled by default, and community maintained addons (currently

Re: [Bf-committers] replacing an EditFace vert question

bump - cambo or ton can you answer here? LetterRip On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:04 AM, wrote: > Hi > > if I need to replace an editface's editvert with some other editvert > should I need to directly replace in the structure and down edges > structure too? or is better to create a new face with th

Re: [Bf-committers] Proposal: Blender OpenCL compositor

Also, not knowing that much about OpenCL so far, I'm a bit curious - do differences in openCL drivers also cause inconsistency problems with output, like previous GPU computing methods have? Will this work also improve CPU multiprocessing efficiency to the same degree as would happen with a system

Re: [Bf-committers] Proposal: Blender OpenCL compositor

Hi, I do think having openCL support is very cool for some nodes as I also believe it should be build on strong foundation. And as we discussed at several point, Blender Compositor structure is getting a bit old (Matt did mention some of the low level issues here : http://www.francois-tarlier.com/

Re: [Bf-committers] LA: Southern California Linux Expo.

Ahhh if only Jae wasn't in the hospital!!! We'd go represent!!! On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Ton Roosendaal wrote: > Hi all, > > We've been invited to participate in this Linux Expo, in Los Angeles, > Hilton LAX, 25-27 february. They have a table, electricity, internet + > complementary pass

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.?? FreeBSD official port

In reply to pete larabell (xgl.asyl...@gmail.com): > Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:33:29 -0600 > From: pete larabell > To: bf-blender developers > Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.?? FreeBSD official port > Reply-To: bf-blender developers > > sorry for my ignorance, but is there anything i c

[Bf-committers] LA: Southern California Linux Expo.

Hi all, We've been invited to participate in this Linux Expo, in Los Angeles, Hilton LAX, 25-27 february. They have a table, electricity, internet + complementary passes for us. Anyone in the LA vicinity interested to pursue this opportunity? You'll have to bring an own system... but I can

Re: [Bf-committers] [Bf-blender-cvs] SVN commit: /data/svn/bf-blender [34284] trunk/blender/source/blender: bugfix [#24774] Lattice modifier+Dupligroup+Texture solid=weird result

thank you cam Daniel Salazar www.3developer.com On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Campbell Barton wrote: > reverted this, will need to see why this works fine in 2.4x but not 2,5. > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Salazar - 3Developer.com > wrote: >> This commit slows down dupligroup

Re: [Bf-committers] [Bf-blender-cvs] SVN commit: /data/svn/bf-blender [34284] trunk/blender/source/blender: bugfix [#24774] Lattice modifier+Dupligroup+Texture solid=weird result

reverted this, will need to see why this works fine in 2.4x but not 2,5. On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Salazar - 3Developer.com wrote: > This commit slows down dupligroups massively. Noted by Bassam too on IRC > > cheers > Daniel Salazar > > > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Campbel

Re: [Bf-committers] [Bf-blender-cvs] SVN commit: /data/svn/bf-blender [34284] trunk/blender/source/blender: bugfix [#24774] Lattice modifier+Dupligroup+Texture solid=weird result

This commit slows down dupligroups massively. Noted by Bassam too on IRC cheers Daniel Salazar On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Campbell Barton wrote: > Revision: 34284 >           > http://projects.blender.org/plugins/scmsvn/viewcvs.php?view=rev&root=bf-blender&revision=34284 > Author:   cam