Re: [Bf-committers] About bug 27570 (applying modifiers when disabled in 3D views)

2011-06-08 Thread Daniel Pujiula Buhl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In my opinion that's a good idea, but there should be a warning displayed to the user to remember that he is going to accept invisible/disabled modifiers. Like the warning when you're going to override an existing file. Cheers, Daniel PS: This is my

[Bf-committers] About bug 27570 (applying modifiers when disabled in 3D views)

2011-06-08 Thread Bastien Montagne
Hi, in http://projects.blender.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=27570 …quarkdoll put an interesting subject on the table, IMO : Should we allow a modifier to be applied, even when it is not enabled for 3D views ? This can become important in situations like heavy booleans, as computing m

Re: [Bf-committers] soc-2010-nicks Recast & Detour branch ready for merge

2011-06-08 Thread Jonathan Smith
You should fill out this page in the wiki: http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:2.6/Source/Development/Merge_And_Integration_Plan Which is part of the plan for merging branches. >From what I understand, no new features are being added to Blender till the 2.58 release is out. The next one will be

Re: [Bf-committers] Patch: Adaptive time step for fluid particles

2011-06-08 Thread Alex Fraser
- Original Message - > [...] > frames. If two objects share the same particle settings, the results > will differ; but if you make the particle settings single user and > keep the parameters the same, the results will be the same. The patch has been updated: http://projects.blender.o