Is there a possibility of bringing back the 'double press' keys for
different functions? (Like the old B=Box select, BB=Circle Select). I
personally want to have 1 be front view, 1,1 be back view, 7 be top view 7,7
be bottom view, etc, etc. Holding Ctrl all the time is giving me a hellava
bad pa
Am 15.07.2011 10:57, schrieb Sean Olson:
> Is there a possibility of bringing back the 'double press' keys for
> different functions? (Like the old B=Box select, BB=Circle Select). I
> personally want to have 1 be front view, 1,1 be back view, 7 be top view 7,7
> be bottom view, etc, etc. Holdin
mathutils is not too dependent on the rest of blender so I've setup a
project to allow mathutils to run as a standalone python module.
http://code.google.com/p/blender-mathutils/
not sure how useful this will end up being but this has been requested
before and if someones already familier with ma
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Campbell Barton wrote:
> Nope, the api is not stable and probably wont be until blender
> development ceases.
so.. that mean that the api never will be stable ? because blender is
always in development, like
any other software.
At this point, when you alr
Completely agree with what Diego said.
Also, having the breaking changes in the release notes isn't very useful when
working on development builds. Breaking changes should be documented as they
are made (and a commit log is not documentation).
Martin
--- On Fri, 7/15/11, Diego B wrote:
> Fro
If we were to do this, I personally would like to see it as a preference you
could change.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 15, 2011, at 3:40 AM, Carsten Wartmann wrote:
> Am 15.07.2011 10:57, schrieb Sean Olson:
>> Is there a possibility of bringing back the 'double press' keys for
>> different fun
I would like to clarify, i'm not talking about defaults, just having
the option to set it up that way. (Though I do feel the default keymap
setup needs some serious thought, its a bit haywired at the moment and
beyond the scope of this thread)
Additionally, it would be nice if this 'toggle' could
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:17:25PM +1000, Campbell Barton wrote:
> mathutils is not too dependent on the rest of blender so I've setup a
> project to allow mathutils to run as a standalone python module.
Is there any reason we don't use NumPy/Scipy?
--
Stephen M. McQuay
http://mcquay.me/vcf
Mathutils wraps internal data structures from the C side.
Martin
--- On Fri, 7/15/11, Stephen M. McQuay wrote:
> From: Stephen M. McQuay
> Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] 'mathutils' module now available standalone
> To: "bf-blender developers"
> Received: Friday, July 15, 2011, 3:26 PM
> On Fri
I've a 2.49 script I've been wondering when I should try updating to
2.5x, and I see now that the answer is NEVER.
That's ok. I've found the documentation for the new scheme, and
possibly the new scheme itself -- though that is unclear -- almost
impenetrable. Sticking with 2.49 might be the be b
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Stephen M. McQuay wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:17:25PM +1000, Campbell Barton wrote:
>> mathutils is not too dependent on the rest of blender so I've setup a
>> project to allow mathutils to run as a standalone python module.
>
> Is there any reason we don't
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Diego B wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Campbell Barton wrote:
>> Nope, the api is not stable and probably wont be until blender
>> development ceases.
>
> so.. that mean that the api never will be stable ? because blender is
> always in deve
Why does duplication have rotation only with vertex and scale only with
face? I know I can just apply the scale or rotation to get the effect I need
but 2.4 was way better in this respect. Are there future plans or is there
something here I don't get?
Thanks
--
Douglas E Knapp
Creative Commons F
13 matches
Mail list logo
