Hi,
I definitely agree we need better quality control, would like to see
code review used for all bigger changes, while BF employees should
review the smaller commits that go directly to svn.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Thomas Dinges blen...@dingto.org wrote:
Another thing that came up
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Thomas Dinges blen...@dingto.org wrote:
Hey Matt and Campnell,
I generally agree with you here, but I don't agree with 5) All new
features are developed in a branch
What defines a new feature? How big must the impact be for it? I mean
it's senseless to write
Hi all,
We've had a great time on Siggraph! I've made a report here for
everyone:
http://www.blender.org/blenderorg/blender-foundation/press/siggraph-2011/
Thanks,
-Ton-
Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation
Hi,
Nice to see this issue finally tackled.
I'm not a blender coder but here are my two cents.
- Distance
It seems you're computing the distance to the origin (zero) of object space.
It would be better to use the center of the object bounding box (which
I think is stored with object, not sure if
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Nathan Vegdahl ces...@cessen.com wrote:
What defines a new feature? How big must the impact be
for it? I mean it's senseless to write a small feature which
only affects a few lines in some areas to be developed in
a branch.
When branches are expensive, yeah,
