[Bf-committers] Keep SCons relevant to CMake

2014-12-22 Thread Sergey Sharybin
Hey, This rant is caused by the following change: https://developer.blender.org/rBe67fd7a (Cambo, sorry, this commit just happened to be the most recent which demonstrates the issue we're having). Well, it was fair enough change to split appdir routines into dedicated file keeping path utils smal

Re: [Bf-committers] Error in Python API Reference

2014-12-22 Thread Campbell Barton
Hi, this was resolved recently, https://developer.blender.org/rB8b2fbd6bbf6f4a56dbc1fa899dd44e21a2c17d0a Currently fixes to docs dont get back-ported to the previous release. but the correction will be in 2.73 On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 2:44 AM, Isaac Weaver wrote: > Hi, not sure if this is the rig

Re: [Bf-committers] Keep SCons relevant to CMake

2014-12-22 Thread Campbell Barton
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Sergey Sharybin wrote: > Hey, > > This rant is caused by the following change: > https://developer.blender.org/rBe67fd7a (Cambo, sorry, this commit just > happened to be the most recent which demonstrates the issue we're having). > > Well, it was fair enough change

Re: [Bf-committers] Keep SCons relevant to CMake

2014-12-22 Thread Sergey Sharybin
This isn't really special yeah. But the things are: 1. this kind of issue happened like 2-3 times in past month. 2. it might be really tricky to discover such kind of issues (could be even trickier than discovering stupidness in actual code). What i call for is: just pay a bit more attention when

Re: [Bf-committers] Keep SCons relevant to CMake

2014-12-22 Thread Campbell Barton
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Sergey Sharybin wrote: > Hey, > > This rant is caused by the following change: > https://developer.blender.org/rBe67fd7a (Cambo, sorry, this commit just > happened to be the most recent which demonstrates the issue we're having). > > Well, it was fair enough change

Re: [Bf-committers] Keep SCons relevant to CMake

2014-12-22 Thread Sergey Sharybin
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Campbell Barton wrote: > Apart from my response (to being made an example of :) ) > Hey, don't get it personal or get insulted! :) As said, that commit just happened to be the most recent, it doesn't mean it's your personal fault or so. We all (including myself)

[Bf-committers] regression fix for collada

2014-12-22 Thread Gaia
Hi; i found that some collada files with missing armature now are completely rejected by the Blender collada importer. Up to Blender 2.72b these meshes where imported but without animation data (weight maps). btw: Autodesk tools import these meshes just fine (including the weight maps) For 2.73