Hi my name is: "Nobuyuki Hirakata"
My user name on developer.blender.org is: "Gappy1"
I would like commit access to the addons repository.
I am the maintainer of the addon: "object_fracture_cell"
New to Blender and it's task is here:
Update Cell Fracture and cell fracture crackit addons Blender 2.
- Germano Cavalcante de Sousa (mano-wii) for work on snapping tools
and precision modeling. (3 months)
Very much needed and welcome improvement; one of my last remaining
gripes with Blender.
Congrats to Germano and thanks to the Blender foundation to recognize
the issue and actually dedicate
It would allow removing half of the code in `transform_snap_object.c`, also the
`BLI_bvhtree_find_nearest_projected` function would no longer be needed.
The main code would be created in the DRW manager especially in a new engine
called `Select Engine` (proposed here -> https://developer.blender.
Hi everyone,
Thanks to the growth of the Development Fund we could afford a couple of
more grants for the 2nd half of 2019. All existing grants have been
renewed. New are two people:
- Germano Cavalcante de Sousa (mano-wii) for work on snapping tools and
precision modeling. (3 months)
- Nath
I understand some cases would run without the BVH, and looking at
those individually the code would be simpler. But this wouldn't be
helpful if all the snapping code together is not simpler.
So this is still not clear to me. Would this allow removing much of
the snapping BVH code, yes or no?
On M
Hi brecht,
Here the questions + reply:
"...if this does not completely replace the snapping BVH, how does this reduce
memory usage or simplify the code? Wouldn't it do the opposite?"
Mixed snap and snap for vertices or edges would run with the new technique
without BVH.
There are also other type
There was earlier discussion on this here.
https://developer.blender.org/D2795
My understanding is that the old code would remain for faces. So if
this does not completely replace the snapping BVH, how does this
reduce memory usage or simplify the code? Wouldn't it do the opposite?
What about cas
