On 24/03/15 00:12, Antony Riakiotakis wrote:
> Own stupidity was the main reason, apparently I disabled non-portable
> build on my build script recently and calling blender was just using
> an obsolete version which needed the deleted library. Sorry for the
> noise. OSL still fails at cmake config
ure
> your OSL is all fine (you'll need to do it once we're finished with
> preparing libs and making needed changes).
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:20 PM, AIBlender wrote:
>
>> On 19/11/14 11:06, Sergey Sharybin wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> There
On 19/11/14 11:06, Sergey Sharybin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There was a bug in the OSL library which lead to some heisen-crashes of
> Blender. The patch has been now accepted to the upstream of OSL, so we
> should use it for the next release.
>
> It doesn't seem safe to use current git version of the libra
On 13/11/14 14:32, Sergey Sharybin wrote:
> Addressing this: >> I understand the reasoning behind it Sergey, but if new
> people want to build Blender they should get something which is approaching
> a feature complete build, otherwise what is the point of using a Dev build.
>
> Why would motion tr
On 13/11/14 14:24, Campbell Barton wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:05 PM, AIBlender wrote:
>> On 13/11/14 11:31, Campbell Barton wrote:
>>> This is mainly for Linux/BSD developers (releases remain unchanged).
>>>
>>> Its getting increasingly diffic
; proposal is about.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:05 PM, AIBlender wrote:
>
>> On 13/11/14 11:31, Campbell Barton wrote:
>>> This is mainly for Linux/BSD developers (releases remain unchanged).
>>>
>>> Its getting increasingly difficult to build Blend
On 13/11/14 11:31, Campbell Barton wrote:
> This is mainly for Linux/BSD developers (releases remain unchanged).
>
> Its getting increasingly difficult to build Blender on Linux, (LLVM,
> ffmpeg, OpenCollada...) & these issue's can't always be fixed on our
> side.
>
> With newer developers a failed
On 02/11/14 13:45, SOADed wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I have the same issue you have here (but on fedora) :
> http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-committers/2014-September/044201.html,
> but I'm failing to see any answer ? Did you manage to fix the issue ? What
> was wrong ? I hope this is a minor is
On 11/03/14 11:36, Gaia wrote:
> hi;
> please can you create some advertising logos which can be used to make
> advertisement for the project ? It would also be fine to have a "We
> support Gooseberry" logo as well for active supporters.
>
> thanks
> ___
