Re: [Bf-committers] Actuall usability of some tools and new features

2009-11-19 Thread Jon Sandström
Brecht Van Lommel skrev: > > I think this is where we disagree > then i will not push this much further, i've made my point and i hope it has been taken, which i appreciate. i must only once more say that the proposed workflow co-exists with current, it does not replace it. how you use it is

Re: [Bf-committers] Actuall usability of some tools and new features

2009-11-19 Thread Jon Sandström
; navigation, but I think we should keep the hierarchy as flat as > possible. Right now we have one level for tabs, and a second level for > panels that you only sometimes need to navigate because usually it > will show what you want. > > Brecht. > > 2009/11/19 Jon Sandström : &g

Re: [Bf-committers] Actuall usability of some tools and new features

2009-11-19 Thread Jon Sandström
I wrote a proposal that adress your second statement (and more) some time ago to the taskforce-25 list. It didn't get too much attention then, but i'll include it in this mail as nothing has been done, and i did not get very much feedback. here is the original mail: -- The buttons wi