Re: [Bf-committers] Blender now requires boost 1.47?

2011-09-06 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Brecht Van Lommel wrote: > Hi, > > I've changed the minimum version to 1.34 now. Thanks! Richard ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender now requires boost 1.47?

2011-09-06 Thread Brecht Van Lommel
Hi, I've changed the minimum version to 1.34 now. Brecht. On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Jeff Doyle wrote: >> Hi Richard, >> >>> Are you currently using scons for building? >>> >> >> I normally use code::blocks for building Blender but on

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender now requires boost 1.47?

2011-09-06 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Jeff Doyle wrote: > Hi Richard, > >> Are you currently using scons for building? >> > > I normally use code::blocks for building Blender but once in a while I > use cmake to build and as a reference to update the code::blocks project > files when new files/build op

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender now requires boost 1.47?

2011-09-06 Thread Jeff Doyle
Hi Richard, > Are you currently using scons for building? > I normally use code::blocks for building Blender but once in a while I use cmake to build and as a reference to update the code::blocks project files when new files/build options get added or deleted. The reason I didn't see the proble

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender now requires boost 1.47?

2011-09-06 Thread Matt Henley
I got this message yesterday also.. I am on a gentoo setup. I managed to get boost 1.47 installed by using an overlay. Knowing its not a requirement... I may back it out as I try to keep the number of overlays as low as possible since they tend to cause problems down the road. On Tue, Sep 6, 201

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender now requires boost 1.47?

2011-09-06 Thread Richard Shaw
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Jeff Doyle wrote: > I've been building Cycles for many months now on Fedora 15 so decided to > try cmake on a clean build directory to see if I could duplicate the > problem that Richard has. Are you currently using scons for building? >  Yep, got the same error

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender now requires boost 1.47?

2011-09-05 Thread Jeff Doyle
I've been building Cycles for many months now on Fedora 15 so decided to try cmake on a clean build directory to see if I could duplicate the problem that Richard has. Yep, got the same error message as Richard did. So definately a problem in CMakeLists.txt in the root directory asking for 1.47

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender now requires boost 1.47?

2011-09-05 Thread Richard Shaw
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Jeff Doyle wrote: > Cycles builds fine for me on Fedora 15 with Boost 1.46. Funny, I get this during configuration: CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindBoost.cmake:1128 (message): Unable to find the requested Boost libraries. Boost version: 1.46.0

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender now requires boost 1.47?

2011-09-05 Thread Jeff Doyle
Cycles builds fine for me on Fedora 15 with Boost 1.46. Jeff Doyle (nfz). ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers

Re: [Bf-committers] Blender now requires boost 1.47?

2011-09-05 Thread Brecht Van Lommel
Hi, Cycles doesn't need 1.47 specifically, any reasonably recent version should be ok. Brecht. On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I just svn up'ed from the blender-cycles branch and tried to compile > only to find out I need boost 1.47 and Fedora 15 shipped with 1.46. Is > th

[Bf-committers] Blender now requires boost 1.47?

2011-09-05 Thread Richard Shaw
I just svn up'ed from the blender-cycles branch and tried to compile only to find out I need boost 1.47 and Fedora 15 shipped with 1.46. Is this a hard requirement? I don't think F15 will be getting 1.47 but I can ask. Thanks, Richard ___ Bf-committers m