Re: [Bf-committers] Defaults for RNA array parameters

2011-07-26 Thread Brecht Van Lommel
Hi Tom, There was an error in the function calling code, fix in svn, hopefully it works now. Brecht. On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Tom Edwards cont...@steamreview.org wrote: Brecht, I see uninitialised memory whenever I should see the default. It has never worked, and there are no code

Re: [Bf-committers] Defaults for RNA array parameters

2011-07-26 Thread Tom Edwards
Everything is working now. :) On 26/07/2011 5:02, Brecht Van Lommel wrote: Hi Tom, There was an error in the function calling code, fix in svn, hopefully it works now. Brecht. On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Tom Edwardscont...@steamreview.org wrote: Brecht, I see uninitialised memory

Re: [Bf-committers] Defaults for RNA array parameters

2011-07-23 Thread Brecht Van Lommel
Hi Tom, It's not clear to me when you saw uninitialized memory, am I right thinking that the malloc made it work, but didn't look like a good solution? In other places the array is defined static to keep it in memory, without a malloc. Brecht. On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Tom Edwards

[Bf-committers] Defaults for RNA array parameters

2011-07-22 Thread Tom Edwards
I can't work out how to provide a default value for an RNA array parameter. Ominously, the unit tests don't cover this at all. The code is: const int default_layout_size = sizeof(float) * 12; const float default_layout_stack[] = { 0,0, 0,1, 0,2, 1,0, 1,1, 1,2 }; float* default_layout_heap =