Hi,
I just wanted to ask if something is wrong with the way the seqence-editor uses
its cache.
Basically I have a 1920*1080 exr seqence that I can't get to playback at 25fps
although I have more than sufficient memory and I have set it in the prefs.
Playing back the same sequence as jpg is no pro
Hmmm...it sounds like it's just way more expensive to process the
files in this case since they are floats. Generally there are some
non-obvious tricks to make the sequencer play back better such as
disabling anti aliasing and making sure the target resolution is close
to the footage resolution.
Does the sequence editor in it's current state do any caching during
playback?
If you're editing exr sequences it might really make sense to work with
jpg proxies.
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 12:05 +0100, Antony Riakiotakis wrote:
> Hmmm...it sounds like it's just way more expensive to process the
> fil
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Bassam Kurdali wrote:
> Does the sequence editor in it's current state do any caching during
> playback?
> If you're editing exr sequences it might really make sense to work with
> jpg proxies.
Just to be sure, you do have the cach turned up in the preferences?
In fact it would be quite nice if the memory cap came in percentage of
total memory instead of megabytes.
2015-04-07 17:24 GMT-04:00 Knapp :
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Bassam Kurdali wrote:
>
> > Does the sequence editor in it's current state do any caching during
> > playback?
> > If y
I've had this question for years and never bothered to ask it. Is the
VSE cache memory limit tied to or separate from the undo memory limit in
the editing portion of the user prefs? It's not very clear from the wiki
docs or from tooltips.
On 04/07/2015 02:26 PM, David Fenner wrote:
> In fact it
