On Jan 8, 2010, at 12:45 AM, Fischlin Andreas wrote:
> My personal data base has 13'591 records and I do not know how sluggish BD
> would get if I would transfer all records to it.
File a bug with a sample if it's slow. The largest file I tested with has
~25000 entries, and the only slowdowns
On Jan 8, 2010, at 13:20, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 2010, at 12:20, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 8, 2010, at 0:59, david craig wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, david craig wrote:
The obvious thing would seem to be to create, say, a static group for
eac
On Jan 8, 2010, at 12:20, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 2010, at 0:59, david craig wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, david craig wrote:
>>> The obvious thing would seem to be to create, say, a static group for
>>> each paper. The next thing would be to save just this group as a
>>
On Jan 8, 2010, at 0:59, david craig wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, david craig wrote:
>> The obvious thing would seem to be to create, say, a static group for
>> each paper. The next thing would be to save just this group as a
>> single bib file that would include just the references in the
David,
For whatever it is worth, here is how I use macros. I have a separate file (let
us call publications.bib) in which I have all expansions of abbreviations to
full journal names. I keep this in my personal texmf directory
(~/Library/texmf/bibtex). I have modified the template that Bibdesk
On Jan 8, 2010, at 7:51, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
>
> On Jan 7, 2010, at 9:43 PM, david craig wrote:
>
>>
>>> you just need to stop abusing the global macro feature :). The entire
>>> point of it is to display macros that you do not want included in your
>>> database.
>>
>> More to the point
On Jan 8, 2010, at 5:28, david craig wrote:
>
> Slight quirk:
>
> When you enter global macros directly into BibDesk preferences, they
> show up immediately in a bib file's Database->Macros window.
>
> When you load global macros from a file, they don't show up unless you
> tick "Show all".
