答复: DNS Master server migration.

2008-12-13 Thread tzqian
>>7. Now you have to change NS records in all your zones: replace the old name with a new one. Dose the above setp means you also need to move your upper level DNS Server? If so ,is there a possible that your DNS server disappear while the new upper level DNS don’t take effect for many unexpected r

Re: setup default DNS server with only one record

2008-12-13 Thread Chris Henderson
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:26 AM, Jonathan Petersson wrote: > You want to manipulate the "." zone. The config you have should be valid, > just point your "." zone in named.conf to the zone file. Thanks. This resolved the issue. This is what I did: edit named.conf and replace: zone "." in {

Re: bind memory usage

2008-12-13 Thread Peter Dambier
I can confirm bind 9.4 does run on an (IBM, not Intel) 486-SCL/2 with 16 MB. That cpu can address no more than 16 MB. $ cat /proc/meminfo total:used:free: shared: buffers: cached: Mem: 14540800 10596352 398 3194880 1003520 3518464 Swap: 133885952 11907072 121978880 MemTo

Re: bind memory usage

2008-12-13 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:50:52 -0200, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote: > i'm trying to run bind 9.5.0-P2 on a very low memory system. It's a > RouterBoard 450 with 32Mb RAM running OpenWRT. > > r...@sede:~# cat /proc/meminfo > MemTotal:29920 kB > > the problem is that bind se

Re: 50 million records under one domain using Bind

2008-12-13 Thread Vinay Y S
2008/12/13 Matus UHLAR - fantomas : >> > On 13.12.08 17:09, Vinay Y S wrote: >> >> I am studying the scalability and performance characteristics of >> >> different DNS servers. Goal is to find the best suitable server to >> >> host a single domain with 50 million records. I am planning to install >

bind memory usage

2008-12-13 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
Hi, i'm trying to run bind 9.5.0-P2 on a very low memory system. It's a RouterBoard 450 with 32Mb RAM running OpenWRT. r...@sede:~# cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal:29920 kB the problem is that bind seems to consume a LOT of memory ... well, a lot for low memory devices, i never

Re: 50 million records under one domain using Bind

2008-12-13 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> > On 13.12.08 17:09, Vinay Y S wrote: > >> I am studying the scalability and performance characteristics of > >> different DNS servers. Goal is to find the best suitable server to > >> host a single domain with 50 million records. I am planning to install > >> Fedora 10 x86_64 on a 32GB RAM machi

Re: 50 million records under one domain using Bind

2008-12-13 Thread Vinay Y S
2008/12/13 Matus UHLAR - fantomas : > On 13.12.08 17:09, Vinay Y S wrote: >> I am studying the scalability and performance characteristics of >> different DNS servers. Goal is to find the best suitable server to >> host a single domain with 50 million records. I am planning to install >> Fedora 10

Re: 50 million records under one domain using Bind

2008-12-13 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 13.12.08 17:09, Vinay Y S wrote: > I am studying the scalability and performance characteristics of > different DNS servers. Goal is to find the best suitable server to > host a single domain with 50 million records. I am planning to install > Fedora 10 x86_64 on a 32GB RAM machine and use the B

50 million records under one domain using Bind

2008-12-13 Thread Vinay Y S
Hi, I am studying the scalability and performance characteristics of different DNS servers. Goal is to find the best suitable server to host a single domain with 50 million records. I am planning to install Fedora 10 x86_64 on a 32GB RAM machine and use the Bind that comes with it for this experime