On 22 Gru, 23:51, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
> At Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:47:37 -0800 (PST),
>
> y...@irc.pl wrote:
> > I think to change to version 9.4.3 because of interesing feature
> > "acache".
> > I would like to speed up response time for my clients.
>
> > My DNS server is mostly (95%) caching
On Dec 20, 2008, at 11:59 PM, billious wrote:
Chris Buxton says what?:
/etc/default/sysklogd
Would that not be:
/etc/default/syslogd ?
Sorry, you are correct. My mistake.
Chris Buxton
Professional Services
Men & Mice
___
bind-users mailing list
b
Hi,
I need to create a new Windows 2008 domain in a network with an existing
Bind setup. I know I need dynamic DNS for the Windows domain. I also
know I need GSS support to get secure dynamic updates and this is
supported in Bind 9.5.0. However I can't figure out how to configure
everything prop
Would a dynamically created A record override an explicitly established one
in the zone file?
If so, can I deny dynamic updates for specific hostnames? I would like to
allow my Windows computers to dynamically update their names, but I don't
want to have a situation where a computer named "www" do
On Dec 23 2008, wes wrote:
Would a dynamically created A record override an explicitly established one
in the zone file?
After the event, there's no difference between a record that was dynamically
created and one that was "explicitly established", by which I take you to
mean one created by ed
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008, ivan jr sy wrote:
I have confirmed that the ARCH=x86_64 trick resolved the issues with my
configuration. I have tested this with an authoritative and recursive
dns/bind95 port with modified Makefile.
I have not fully tested the acl.c and iptable.c since the patch suit my
At Tue, 23 Dec 2008 01:34:35 -0800 (PST),
y...@irc.pl wrote:
> > No, "acache" is specifically intended to be used for authoritative
> > servers. It doesn't improve anything for a caching (only) server.
> Just to be sure.
> When my server start working and have clear memory and for example
> clien
BIND 9.6.0 is now available.
BIND 9.6.0 is a development release of BIND 9.
Bugs should be reported to bind9-b...@isc.org.
BIND 9.6 has a number of new features over 9.5, including:
Full NSEC3 support
Automatic zone re-signing
New update-policy
BIND 9.5.1 is now available.
BIND 9.5.1 is a maintenance release for BIND 9.5.
BIND 9.5.1 can be downloaded from
ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.5.1/bind-9.5.1.tar.gz
The PGP signature of the distribution is at
ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.5.1/bind-9.5.1
Four things must be done to allow Bind 9 to support GSS-TKEY:
* kinit must work on the host which will run BIND 9. This means
krb5.conf must be properly configured with the realm and
locations of the Kerberos servers.
* Bind 9 must be compiled with GSSAPI enabled.
* Bind 9
Rob Austein wrote:
> Four things must be done to allow Bind 9 to support GSS-TKEY:
>
> * kinit must work on the host which will run BIND 9. This means
> krb5.conf must be properly configured with the realm and
> locations of the Kerberos servers.
> * Bind 9 must be compiled wit
Hello, I am working with a client of mine, who jumped right into
developing a backend system for managing his arsenal of sites. I am
not entirely sure what he is up to, but there is potential to have to
add in 50,000 zones.
From what I can gather, all the zones are the same, they all have
You can make a single generic file and reference that one file repeatedly in
the named.conf in each zone definition. I do that frequently for private IP
address space. But keep in mind that if there are any errors in the file,
you loose EVERYTHING. You can also consider using "INCLUDE" statements i
13 matches
Mail list logo
