Re: how bind supports multi-processors?

At Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:11:07 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > That's an optional feature, even if it's enabled by default when found > > to be available by autoconf. If the atomic operations cause stability > > problems, you can disable them by rebuilding BIND9 with --disable-atomic. > > Would

Re: how bind supports multi-processors?

* JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉: > That's an optional feature, even if it's enabled by default when found > to be available by autoconf. If the atomic operations cause stability > problems, you can disable them by rebuilding BIND9 with --disable-atomic. Would it be possible to disable them by default on

Re: how bind supports multi-processors?

At Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:48:34 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Is threads stable enough in product use of Bind? > > It's stable on mainstream architectures. GNU/Linux on i386 and amd64 > is fine in general. GNU/Linux on hppa, mips(el), ia64, and others is > problematic. The hppa instability co

Re: how bind supports multi-processors?

* Ralf Peng: > Is threads stable enough in product use of Bind? It's stable on mainstream architectures. GNU/Linux on i386 and amd64 is fine in general. GNU/Linux on hppa, mips(el), ia64, and others is problematic. The hppa instability could be due to the lack of a stable SMP kernel. The ia64