RE: Root Server Simulation Communication Problem

2009-03-23 Thread T MANIKANDAN-PKXR74
Hi Ben, Thanks for reply now my root server (rootns.man) is responding to abc.com. after enabling the recursion to Yes in abc.com server, now my question is, Is my abc.com still called authoritative Name server or a caching name server I was intend to set up a authoritative name server, and hope

Re: Server names for query

2009-03-23 Thread Kevin Darcy
Casey Deccio wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote: For the *initial* NS query, I believe BIND will resolve those names down to a flat set of addresses, all of which have equal chance of being tried, so, yes, if a given NS name resolves to more addresses than other names,

Re: Server names for query

2009-03-23 Thread Casey Deccio
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote: > For the *initial* NS query, I believe BIND will resolve those names down to > a flat set of addresses, all of which have equal chance of being tried, so, > yes, if a given NS name resolves to more addresses than other names, it is > more likely

Re: Server names for query

2009-03-23 Thread Kevin Darcy
Casey Deccio wrote: RFC 1035 [1] (page 44) describes the use of a list of server names (SLIST) to query for a particular name. It is unclear to me from the RFC as to whether the server is selected by address or by name. In other words, all history (e.g., batting average and response time) be

Server names for query

2009-03-23 Thread Casey Deccio
RFC 1035 [1] (page 44) describes the use of a list of server names (SLIST) to query for a particular name. It is unclear to me from the RFC as to whether the server is selected by address or by name. In other words, all history (e.g., batting average and response time) being equal, if a name reso

Re: ACL ?

2009-03-23 Thread Chris Thompson
On Mar 23 2009, John D. Vo wrote: Trying to implement acl in my named.conf... for Bind 9.2.2 acl eagle { 192.168.1.0/24; localhost; }; But when I issued an reload, I got: Mar 23 08:55:39 ns1 named[13578]: [ID 866145 daemon.error] /etc/named.conf:2: unknown option 'acl' Mar 23 08:55:39 ns1 na

Re: ACL ?

2009-03-23 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <49c79d6b.7060...@eagle.net>, "John D. Vo" writes: > Greetings: > > Trying to implement acl in my named.conf... for Bind 9.2.2 > > acl eagle { 192.168.1.0/24; localhost; }; > > But when I issued an reload, I got: > > Mar 23 08:55:39 ns1 named[13578]: [ID 866145 daemon.error] > /etc

Re: ACL ?

2009-03-23 Thread John D. Vo
Worked like a charm. Thanks. -John Alan Clegg wrote: John D. Vo wrote: Greetings: Trying to implement acl in my named.conf... for Bind 9.2.2 acl eagle { 192.168.1.0/24; localhost; }; But when I issued an reload, I got: Mar 23 08:55:39 ns1 named[13578]: [ID 866145 daemon.erro

ACL ?

2009-03-23 Thread John D. Vo
Greetings: Trying to implement acl in my named.conf... for Bind 9.2.2 acl eagle { 192.168.1.0/24; localhost; }; But when I issued an reload, I got: Mar 23 08:55:39 ns1 named[13578]: [ID 866145 daemon.error] /etc/named.conf:2: unknown option 'acl' Mar 23 08:55:39 ns1 named[13578]: [ID 866145 d