On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 04:06:18PM +0100, Nelson Vale wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I've been facing a problem in my private network which I was not able to fix
> yet.
>
> In my gateway (linux debian alike) I have bind 9.5 installed and running,
> and I have one IPSec tunnel to another gateway over the
Hi,
Thank you all for your help. This fix surely made the difference :).
echo "1" >/proc/sys/net/core/xfrm_larval_drop
Nelson Vale
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Adam Tkac wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 04:06:18PM +0100, Nelson Vale wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > I've been facing a probl
Hello,
It's come to our attention that when libbind 6.0 was released, a little
over a month ago, something went wrong with the mail announcing it and it
never got outside ISC. My apologies for not noticing the error sooner,
and here's the mail again:
ISC libbind 6.0 is now avail
I have to bother you all again.
I was asked Friday afternoon about using a database with the new BIND
servers. To me it seems using MySQL or PostgreSQL is a bit like
hunting rabbits with a howitzer though Berkely DB looks like a good
fit. I can find patches for all three but no real information
I use the DLZ/PG backend and it's rock solid. I use Ant with a few
modifications for my front end.
Stephen Carville wrote:
> I have to bother you all again.
>
> I was asked Friday afternoon about using a database with the new BIND
> servers. To me it seems using MySQL or PostgreSQL is a bit like
Next stage of evolution = Dynamic Update. Never have to futz with
bumping serial numbers ever again.
- Kevin
Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
You may find named-compilezone useful to get your zone files in a
consistent format before performing your mass update.
//Brad
On May 2, 2009, at 3:39 PM, S
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Stephen Carville
wrote:
> Anyone here have experience or an informed opinion in using a database
> backend to BIND?
I've been using the pgsql sdb backend for 5+ years, wrote my own php
front end to it.
Its been solid.
--
aRDy Music and Rick Dicaire present:
http:
When are tcp dns queries necessary?
It was my understanding that clients could user tcp or
udp.
Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK
Systems Engineer
OSU Information Technology Department Telecommunications Services Group
___
bind-us
Hi,
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Martin McCormick
wrote:
>When are tcp dns queries necessary?
>
>It was my understanding that clients could user tcp or
> udp.
According to what I read, dns queries are executed using udp
Only zone transfers use tcp connections.
But still acc
In addition, TCP is used for queries > 512bytes.
Josh
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of Eduardo Júnior
Sent: Mon 5/4/2009 8:35 PM
To: Martin McCormick
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: tcp versus udp
Hi,
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:28 PM
On May 4, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Martin McCormick wrote:
When are tcp dns queries necessary?
It was my understanding that clients could user tcp or
udp.
When a response can not fit in a single UDP packet the server will
mark the truncated flag (and respond with all the data it c
Matt Baxter writes:
> When a response can not fit in a single UDP packet the server will mark
> the
> truncated flag (and respond with all the data it can inside the UDP
> packet). That should trigger a client to resubmit the query via TCP. Zone
> transfers are the most common use for TCP, but it
Also if EDNS0 is in effect theoretically the max size would be 4096 bytes
before a truncate happened.
--
-Ben Croswell
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Martin McCormick
wrote:
> Matt Baxter writes:
> > When a response can not fit in a single UDP packet the server will mark
> > the
> > truncated
I'm seeing lots of DNS resolution failures on my router (running Utuntu
8.10, bind 9.3.4). While most succeed, I get quite a few FORMERR errors
similar to:
May 4 20:25:25 localhost named[19579]: FORMERR resolving '
imap.gmail.com/A/IN': 66.151.140.2#53
May 4 20:25:25 localhost named[19579]: FORM
14 matches
Mail list logo
