Hi,
Thanks for the advices, i've run the test (named -g after kill) and the
realize the zonecheck of the AFNIC.FR has passed.
As I didn't do nothing in between, I guess this was maybe a temporary
error of the AFNIC.FR zonecheck utility (which says UDP port 53 was not
reachable).
Is there a
By saying things like We load the authoritative data into memory so
that is also cached data and other nonsense the vendor is stating
that this behavior is in compliance with the RFCs and refusing to fix
their code. Very frustrating, as I believe this behavior is clearly
wrong and also
Hi Jesse,
Have you tried a make distclean to remove all traces of the previous
configure or removing and re-extracting the bind tarball?
Andy
Jesse Cabral wrote:
I can't seem to get bind reconfigured to run with no threads ? Anyone have
any thoughts ?
When I rerun ./configure
Good suggestion.
I just tried that and re-ran the ./configure --disable-threads
Then I killed the named pid and started named:
ps -Leo user,pid,ppid,lstart,lwp,nlwp,psr,args |egrep LWP|named
USER PID PPID STARTED LWP NLWP PSR COMMAND
named14671 1 Fri May 29
At least now it shows all the threads on a single processor.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Jesse Cabral
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 1:57 PM
To: 'Jeffrey Reasoner'
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE:
If I should not be sending this to this list please let me know.
Please let me know if you think I have this wrong:
Bare Minimum to be considered a usable DNS server (under limited
conditions):
When a zone is configured locally as a master or slave zone, only hand
out data from the local
So I can understand the original goal, let me re-clarify the objective.
The problem of Bind hanging is thought to be caused by an interthread lock.
The suggestion is to disables threads.
Let me ask this questions, is the goal to disable threads on
multi-processors or threads completely ?
It
Bind and threading don't get along, I have always had to force bind to
compile without thread support entirely.
Jesse Cabral wrote:
So I can understand the original goal, let me re-clarify the objective.
The problem of Bind hanging is thought to be caused by an interthread lock.
The
At Fri, 29 May 2009 13:56:40 -0400,
Jesse Cabral jcab...@mtsolutions.net wrote:
I just tried that and re-ran the ./configure --disable-threads
Then I killed the named pid and started named:
ps -Leo user,pid,ppid,lstart,lwp,nlwp,psr,args |egrep LWP|named
USER PID PPID
This may have something to do with the different way Linux does threads
compared to UNIX.
On my RHEL5 servers I see named humming along quite happily with 5
threads across two processors so it may be the original hang problem had
nothing to do with threads. I tried to find something that would
Every few releases I try to add threads back in and get the same
results. Both on my 32bit linux and 64bit linux machines (current
gentoo). Named crashes or hangs.
Jeff Lightner wrote:
This may have something to do with the different way Linux does threads
compared to UNIX.
On my RHEL5
At Fri, 29 May 2009 15:41:26 -0400,
David Ford da...@blue-labs.org wrote:
Every few releases I try to add threads back in and get the same
results. Both on my 32bit linux and 64bit linux machines (current
gentoo). Named crashes or hangs.
Jeff Lightner wrote:
This may have something to
Hello,
In BIND configuration, is it possible to set the RD flag to 1, because my DNS
Relay receives DNS Request with RD flag to 0 and the forwarding doesn't work
when this flag is set to 0.
The configuration is this one : Public DNS with delegation of the zone toto
to DNS A, public DNS sent
Does anyone have a script or software they use so that I can
automatically update my A records when a host is unavailable.
i.e.
www.mywebserver.com has 2 IP addresses (A records): 1.1.1.1, 2.2.2.2
When 2.2.2.2 becomes unpingable, I would like to remove it's A
record so it is only 1.1.1.1
When
A server would first have to analyse the request to figure out to which
named instance to route the request. That would most likely eat up any time
you'd save.
2009/5/29 Eduardo Júnior ihtrau...@gmail.com
Hi,
I read about Bind which it works as follow (in general words):
query - named -
In article gvq2q5$q8...@sf1.isc.org,
Takahiro Masuda tmas...@vpls.net wrote:
Also try dig ip +trace
That's only useful if the domain is already delegated to the server you
want to check. I got the impression that he needs to test the server
BEFORE the delegation is implemented (because the
16 matches
Mail list logo
