In message , Chris Peterson
writes:
> ... and only on one host.
>
> So to start, yes my clocks are in sync to within 5 seconds.
>
> First the info on the setup:
>
> There's one master server ns00.example.net, and two slave servers
> ns01.example.net and ns11.example.net.
> The master hosts a
At Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:30:42 +0400,
Dmitry Rybin wrote:
> >>> Please try 9.6.1b1, which we expect to be released next week. It has a
> >>> new experimental feature just for that purpose:
> >> Is this feature going to be back ported to 9.4 and 9.5 releases as well?
> >
> > For 9.5, yes. For 9.4
... and only on one host.
So to start, yes my clocks are in sync to within 5 seconds.
First the info on the setup:
There's one master server ns00.example.net, and two slave servers
ns01.example.net and ns11.example.net.
The master hosts about a dozen zones to the slaves, and uses TSIG for
t
In message <20090622143213.2ea6417...@britaine.cis.anl.gov>, bsfin...@anl.gov w
rites:
> I am running 9.6.0-P1, and I added to my BIND options statement:
>
> avoid-v4-udp-ports { range 20030 20777;};
>
> When I did an "rndc config" I saw this message:
>
> using default UDP/IPv4 port r
I am running 9.6.0-P1, and I added to my BIND options statement:
avoid-v4-udp-ports { range 20030 20777;};
When I did an "rndc config" I saw this message:
using default UDP/IPv4 port range: [1024, 65535]
in /var/adm/messages. Is BIND doing what I wanted (e.g., use UDP
ports 1024-2002
On 21.06.09 13:37, R Dicaire wrote:
> Hi folks, bind 9.6.1...I'm looking in the ARM but I dont see a logging
> category specific to control channel communications.
> In syslog I have (generated by an mrtg script):
>
> named[7837]: received control channel command 'stats'
>
> What category does th
Dear all,
I am writing this question fearfully since it concerns mDNS and bind.
I have read most of the messages in the archives concerning these two... and
yes, I know that bind and mDNS are not the same thing and do not intend to
provide the same service. But still... ok. let's get fried !
I
There is no perfect solution which either a) is technically correct for
everyone, or b) is religiously correct for everyone.
Rather, try to learn how to best implement a given solution correctly
such as SPF if it has value to your organization. There will always be
someone foaming at the mout
I don't get this at all. Rather than ask "WHO" is saying it why not
post reasonable counter arguments to "WHAT" they said.
Much of what one finds on the internet is anonymous at best but doesn't
mean it has no value. Also for all I know they are well respected in
certain areas. When I first
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
At Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:31:37 -0400,
R Dicaire wrote:
Please try 9.6.1b1, which we expect to be released next week. It has a
new experimental feature just for that purpose:
Is this feature going to be back ported to 9.4 and 9.5 releases as well?
For 9.5, yes. Fo
10 matches
Mail list logo
